Not entirely correct.
It's actually 1666 with Trump.
Iโve been waiting SO LONG for my wife to wake up. At this point though I donโt know if she should wake up.
They are either ignorant or complicit. There is no middle ground.
Interdasting, but we're heard shit like this before.
Fuckers.
As I have said for years now. There is a drug dealer on every corner. They go by names like CVS, Walgreens, and Rite-Aid.
Solid comment. Welcome aboard, "handshake".
USAID is known as "the CIA's little sister", so yes these traitors are pissed off.
No clue. Care to explain?
Best I can do. The root of the problem is the central bankers, headquartered out of the City of London which is insanely old.
"The Secret City inside of London Revealed"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrObZ_HZZUc
Here is my post of a video of her's from a few days ago that is easier to understand.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZpc4vDF/the-attacks-on-trump-the-attacks/c/
Beyond that, Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act". (the official name)
We know that the Cabal loves to use the term "Build Back Better". Why? Some say it is because a "b" looks like a "6". Thus 6uild 6back 6better. (Biden in the US and others in the UK and Canada)
Don't believe me?
https://youtu.be/LZkC3zr2Vlo?t=609
6 hours, 6 hours . . . 6 hours
They don't try to hide it.
Much of the City of London burned in the year 1666. The second video I linked to says which bank was re-established at that time.
Thus "One Big Beautiful Bill" translates to 1666. Trump is calling them out.
I appreciate your response. I can see why you're the [Narrative Buster]. Kek!
I'm looking for an objective, material standard (for society, in public) and reasons to back that up.
I grasp the concept of religious people doing religious things because it makes them feel humble before their god and such. It's part of their religious practice.
But, there has to be a line somewhere. Think of it more in terms of legality because that's where my mind is.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/24118241
Hijab, no problem.
Niqab, no. Burka, definitely no.
We can't have a women wearing a burka get their driver's license photo; for example.
Beyond that, I was looking for a great way to wage an argument; at least in the English language.
"Identification, Communication, and Objectification"
I think that has a nice ring to it.
And this goes for atheists wearing face coverings as well.
Joys1Daughter asked me to post it because it was time again for a reminder.
Start at 8:22
- Military coup
or
- Win legitimately
Winning legitimately is going to take longer.
๐๐ข๐ท๐ฆ๐ด ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ.
These are not the droids you're looking for.
That was solid. Thanks!
Mount Dickmore
That's a fair point I assume.
I still see droids wearing masks. One in a theater the other day could definitely have been an atheist.
Something that has been on my mind and I think I have found clarity on.
I'm an atheist, but don't think it matters for this thought exercise. As an atheist I strive for a world view that makes sense that doesn't involve any religion.
Various religions cover their hair. I don't find this a problem unless it is forced. You can shave your head for all I care. Hair can be covered, colored, cut, curled, braided, and even straightened. Hell, even grown out. It is cosmetic.
The face is completely different.
Identification
Communication
Objectification
If the face is covered, it hinders identification.
If the face is covered, it results in impaired communication due to blocking speech, impairing respiration needed to produce speech, and blocks nonverbal communication.
If the face is covered, it removes the humanity of people. They become objects; especially with complete face coverings.
So, generally speaking, face coverings should not be used and definitely should not be mandated.
Note: I don't think a wedding veil is used much anymore to cover the face, but that's more of a form of temporary gift wrapping.
I was tempted to post this, but did not. Too cerebral I thought.
Here is a video from her from a few days ago that I believe is much more clear.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZpc4vDF/the-attacks-on-trump-the-attacks/c/
I can only dream.
F A F O would have been better.
Now that's some California Dreamin'
Here's the deal.
Organizations these days are terrible for two reasons.
They spend an inordinate amount of time to hire people; often holding out for "unicorns".
They fail to fire useless people. In doing so they demoralize anyone they have that is any good.
Just fire them. Save the organization!