So keeping arms is illegal? - The Great Awakening

So keeping arms is illegal? (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by king07828 2 years ago by king07828 +8 / -0

5 comments download

5 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

Comments (5)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Datadude 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

So now it becomes a prohibited residence if a prohibited individual is present, no longer just restricted to the prohibited individual. With everyone present being in legal jeopardy.

These fuckers are playing all the angles.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– holland404 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Like what if you have a gun because you unfortunately live with a dangerous "prohibited individual" and you need to be able to protect yourself and others...

It feels like they are aiming for chaos. I do not consent!

Ban(ish) these politician (demons) instead of banning the tools many need to protect themself.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Datadude 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

If this passes,

And you are in possession a gun while living in the same house as a prohibited individual, then you are in violation of a federal firearms law, (and while not stated in this bill, probably become a prohibited individual yourself by that act).

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– RealCleanUpPhilly 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

If it passes the Senate. Call your Senator, write to them, give money to GOA stat.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– brain_dead 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Why am I not surprised it's Nader? So can we keep legs instead?

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q