Ask them, when you say "no evidence", do you mean that you have personally reviewed all of the evidence, and decided that none of it was credible?
or do you mean that you have literally never seen any of the evidence, and therefore you are absolutely ignorant about all of the evidence?
Because I’m pretty sure the video of an election worker pulling a box full of ballots out from under a table cloth, has never been “debunked”.
Tbh I was not impressed with that piece of evidence as it seemed to be missing context and was far too simple
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/dec/04/facebook-posts/no-georgia-election-workers-didnt-kick-out-observe/
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/12/video-doesnt-show-suitcases-of-illegal-ballots-in-georgia/
The 2000 mules method seems far more interesting and likely than the “box under the table”. I think that there is still more to that story that has yet to come out. Also likely more than one type of attack. We are only fooling ourselves if we believe that the democrats are stupid and unorganized.
I find that sometimes here we will go along with anything that supports our side without questioning it and this is one of those times. This particular claim is pretty thin on details unless I am missing something. I would be happy to be proven wrong here.
Rudy did a pretty poor job on getting the message out and I would dare say that he did more harm than good considering the quality of his press conferences. That was just hard to watch
Ok, since I had a different opinion, begin the downvotes
I'm sorry, but Rudy ruined any chance we had of getting people to believe fraud. Now, the courts may be a whole different scenario (behind the scenes) but Rudy only made Trump look bad with his shenanigans. That black goo dripping down his face and the whole four seasons landscaping thing made him hard to take serious.