Some do not know the difference between a tactical shotgun and a rifle. These are the willfully ignorant anti-gun commies. A tactical shotgun can hold a lot of various rounds for flesh shredding.
Designed to shred Commies both foreign and domestic. The British are still big mad they got their asses kicked by a bunch of farmers with varmint rifles.
Written for shock value.... but every weapon known to man, from the iron age to now, has been designed to shred flesh. There are no "ouchie" weapons when it comes to war or simple self-defense. Oh someone might be a real SPORT about it and use a taser and allow a perp to get up close and personal, but that would be a stupid choice in any context.
Human beings, proudly shredding flesh since the Stone Age. It's who we are; accept it, embrace it, and prepare yourself.
Weapons are designed to kill animals and people by damaging their bodies with physical trauma. That is their purpose. To single one weapon out and imply it is bad because it does physical trauma is like criticizing a toaster for turning bread into toast.
Well since the only case in which Id need to use it, is to defend my life or my childrens lives, shredding the flesh of a maniac who attempts to harm/kill us-- is fine with me. What model is it, can someone tell me so I can go buy something that would be this reliable of a defense?
The point is no lawful citizen is going to use a weapon for a reason other than defense or hunting. So flesh shredding--who cares if my would be attacker is shredded, I sure hope so. A maniac that seeks to kill/rape/harm me or my family--a shredded flesh outcome for that guy is acceptable and preferable.
It will reduce $ to try/convict and house attacker for life. Will also protect the public from a 'wounded' attacker running away and grabbing a hostage or hurting someone else. Heck yes, where can we purchase a BAD GUY SHREDDER?
Fact is, it's not. The specific ammo of 5.56x45 nature this rifle was designed to use is a .223(4, for purists) varmint round but with full metal jacket as required by the Geneva Convention. It is designed to puncture but not necessarily kill. In the mid-1970s, a 5.56 ammo manf designed the SS-109 wasp waist, which was later changed into what is now the M855 light armor piercing round. This round uses a 62 gr bullet as opposed to a 55 gr, and is less stable in a 1-8 twist machine. This causes the bullet to destabilize in soft targets more quickly, but retains stability through light but resistant materials.
In either case, the AR-15/M-16 and variants have a longer and narrower wound channel than the M60/M240 7.62x51 (308 Winchester). Some will argue that the 308 is a much heavier and more potent round, and will therefore penetrate more of that flesh, but that simply is not true, based on ballistic gel testing.
So if you want to pulverize/shred flesh, use an AR-10 or hunting rifle in 308 Win. Incidentally, the Serbian NATO 7.62x51 145 gr FMJ has better penetration through hard material, but still has exceptionally good shocking power, so will blow the brains right through that blue helmet. PPU is a good source if you can get it.
Some do not know the difference between a tactical shotgun and a rifle. These are the willfully ignorant anti-gun commies. A tactical shotgun can hold a lot of various rounds for flesh shredding.
Paint them all rainbow colors and vedazzle the sbit out of themand pay a few "influencers" to show them off.
Soon they will all be clamoring to have one.
Say "AUTOMATIC M-16" and the whole world folds...AND THAT is what the dems are going after...M-16 is ONLY SWITCHED TO AUTOMATIC on MILITARY RIFLE!!!!
Their arguments are false on their face and "high capacity magazines" are false on their face!!!!!!
Designed to shred Commies both foreign and domestic. The British are still big mad they got their asses kicked by a bunch of farmers with varmint rifles.
Written for shock value.... but every weapon known to man, from the iron age to now, has been designed to shred flesh. There are no "ouchie" weapons when it comes to war or simple self-defense. Oh someone might be a real SPORT about it and use a taser and allow a perp to get up close and personal, but that would be a stupid choice in any context.
Human beings, proudly shredding flesh since the Stone Age. It's who we are; accept it, embrace it, and prepare yourself.
Weapons are designed to kill animals and people by damaging their bodies with physical trauma. That is their purpose. To single one weapon out and imply it is bad because it does physical trauma is like criticizing a toaster for turning bread into toast.
Well since the only case in which Id need to use it, is to defend my life or my childrens lives, shredding the flesh of a maniac who attempts to harm/kill us-- is fine with me. What model is it, can someone tell me so I can go buy something that would be this reliable of a defense?
The point is no lawful citizen is going to use a weapon for a reason other than defense or hunting. So flesh shredding--who cares if my would be attacker is shredded, I sure hope so. A maniac that seeks to kill/rape/harm me or my family--a shredded flesh outcome for that guy is acceptable and preferable.
It will reduce $ to try/convict and house attacker for life. Will also protect the public from a 'wounded' attacker running away and grabbing a hostage or hurting someone else. Heck yes, where can we purchase a BAD GUY SHREDDER?
A knife?
The 5.56 is so deadly that the US military is switching to the 277 Sig Fury (6.8x51). 🤔
I want a gun that doesn't hurt or stop people when I shoot them.
Fact is, it's not. The specific ammo of 5.56x45 nature this rifle was designed to use is a .223(4, for purists) varmint round but with full metal jacket as required by the Geneva Convention. It is designed to puncture but not necessarily kill. In the mid-1970s, a 5.56 ammo manf designed the SS-109 wasp waist, which was later changed into what is now the M855 light armor piercing round. This round uses a 62 gr bullet as opposed to a 55 gr, and is less stable in a 1-8 twist machine. This causes the bullet to destabilize in soft targets more quickly, but retains stability through light but resistant materials. In either case, the AR-15/M-16 and variants have a longer and narrower wound channel than the M60/M240 7.62x51 (308 Winchester). Some will argue that the 308 is a much heavier and more potent round, and will therefore penetrate more of that flesh, but that simply is not true, based on ballistic gel testing. So if you want to pulverize/shred flesh, use an AR-10 or hunting rifle in 308 Win. Incidentally, the Serbian NATO 7.62x51 145 gr FMJ has better penetration through hard material, but still has exceptionally good shocking power, so will blow the brains right through that blue helmet. PPU is a good source if you can get it.