it just depends how you voice your questions. first rule of the board is Q supporters only....we're all here because we've decided elsewhere we support Q.
Go read the drops or try patriots.win or some other more general board if you're wanting
Not true that genuine questions are always answered. I also wasnt debating the validity of Q. I can remember some incredible times (esp in 2018) with right on Q posts. Epstein is one of the most memorable Q posts that brought something up before it all came out. Q has proven to be valuable.
It would seem stupid to comment at a q hangout and be like why are you all mad with dvs and doomer talk.
But its possible to believe Q was a real op that helped to open ppls eyes to things we would not have known and think for ourselves more. And at the same time we are analyzing and interpreting things as they occur and if some dont see the up side of how disaster fits with 'the plan' its really quite human and that doesnt qualify as dooming. As well as believing every guy who speaks in coded ways that he knows will appeal to certain groups.
I appreciate that you weighed in here, but friend, this sounds like you agree that questions are not acceptable?
it just depends how you voice your questions. first rule of the board is Q supporters only....we're all here because we've decided elsewhere we support Q.
Go read the drops or try patriots.win or some other more general board if you're wanting
Ive been reading Q since 10-28-17, totally get it. And btw I didnt question Q, actually reiterated the greatest takeaway -- thinking for ourselves.
Not true that genuine questions are always answered. I also wasnt debating the validity of Q. I can remember some incredible times (esp in 2018) with right on Q posts. Epstein is one of the most memorable Q posts that brought something up before it all came out. Q has proven to be valuable.
It would seem stupid to comment at a q hangout and be like why are you all mad with dvs and doomer talk.
But its possible to believe Q was a real op that helped to open ppls eyes to things we would not have known and think for ourselves more. And at the same time we are analyzing and interpreting things as they occur and if some dont see the up side of how disaster fits with 'the plan' its really quite human and that doesnt qualify as dooming. As well as believing every guy who speaks in coded ways that he knows will appeal to certain groups.
Anyway, thanks for weighing in.