๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐ฒ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ณ๐๐ซ ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฅ!
(files.catbox.moe)
โ ๏ธ Vax-TYRANNY โ ๏ธ
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
Don't rely on searching. Read the document.
Page 16
After reading through the 9 results tables, I think that the problem is the results were divided by age. Table 6 is for ages 6 - 23 months and table 8 for ages 2 - 4 years. The totals for those add up to the original 4526 and account for participant loss.
Not saying the study or the approval is legit, just this concern about losing 3000 subjects may not be legit.
Ahh thanks! My bad, if I had searched for "4,526" instead of "4526" I would have found it!