supreme court nominations are always a crap roll. I actually think the two are a 6-7 in rating. compared to a justice Thomas or the late justice Scalia who are 9 and 10 respectively in my book. if a justice is doing their job correctly that means they will make decisions they don't like because their purpose is to rule on the intent of the constitution when it was written. Kavanaugh and Barret do that better than the justices appointed by Obama and bill Clinton. I might not like some of the rulings, but I am in no way a constitutional Schaler. I think that a lot of are upset at conservative justices come from the need for some amendments in the constitution to clarify things.
supreme court nominations are always a crap roll. I actually think the two are a 6-7 in rating. compared to a justice Thomas or the late justice Scalia who are 9 and 10 respectively in my book. if a justice is doing their job correctly that means they will make decisions they don't like because their purpose is to rule on the intent of the constitution when it was written. Kavanaugh and Barret do that better than the justices appointed by Obama and bill Clinton. I might not like some of the rulings, but I am in no way a constitutional Schaler. I think that a lot of are upset at conservative justices come from the need for some amendments in the constitution to clarify things.