I saw this telegram post purportedly from Patrick Byrne last night on the chans. I have no idea when he said this. If it was last night or months/years ago. I'm very interested in what people would say in response to this. I don't have any idea how or where to begin to pick this apart. There are so many reasons this is inaccurate but I cannot come up with a coherent disection.
Byrne's statement:
"Q is a psyop. Psyops use truth and lies in such a way that it elicits a response from the observer. From my perspective, Q has set up a true Hegelian Dialectic by waking and mobilizing the sleeping giant (the "righteous" right) against the Deep State (the "evil left).
What is the fight over? Control of the financial reset. No matter what happens, whether the war is won by Q or the Deep State, the financial system will be reset and the winner gets to control the reset.
What if you don't care to be part of this squabble? What if you just want to walk away from the fight? No, neither of these sides will let you take away control of you. control is the ultimate goal of both sides.
I say it all the time...the right wing(Q) and the left wing (DS) are attached to the same bird. By opposing each other they carry the bird in a single direction, together. This is a Hegelian Dialectic."
I suppose you have to call it a psyop. That is unavoidable. Because it meets the definition entirely. I guess I avoid this reality because psyop has such negative connotations to me. We don't typically discuss psyops that have good motivations behind them. And I do not know of any that were conducted for this purpose previously. So I do not associate psyops with positive feelings.
Something I've found out about this curious species we belong to, Homo sapiens, is that collectively we are not an entirely rational species. Individually we can hold thoughts in our minds, sometimes even contrasting thoughts, weight them, test them, and come to a near approximation of the truth.
But as a whole, the human species is largely irrational, lazy, and doesn't like to dwell much on details, background, context, and other such things in the thinking process.
No, we want to be told STORIES. It probably stems from the oral tradition of telling stories around campfires for most of our existence. A "narrative" that contains all the elements of what is being passed down. Humans respond to a narrative... a story.
And it depends on which narrative -- which story -- you believe that guides your actions. The Left has their narrative about America, the Constitution, our racist past, the SCOTUS decisions... etc. It's a false narrative in my humble opinion.
We have our narratives too.... national pride, meritocracy, fair play, live by the rules...and it seems to have worked very well. That's why the Left hates our narrative, it is an affront to their false narrative.
So Q, in essence, told us a "story" ... a true story, peppered here and their with needed disinformation at times, but a story narrative that we needed to discover our own truth devoid of MSM lies and DS corruption.
And the narrative took root, and has evolved ever-so-slowly into this thing we now call The Great Awakening. That is what I have believed from since almost day 1 when I first got on board the Q Train, in November 2017, the month after Q started posting.
It does not bother me in the least that the posts came out in the form of a narrative, because they fit so well with things we already knew or suspected. The posts gave gravitas to what we were sensing and knew in our hearts. So like children sitting around a tribal campfire deep in the forest, we listened to these stories, the whole narrative, and out of it did some growing up and began to face some harsh truths.
And here we are today, looking back at the past few years and thinking, "Damn! What a ride!" And looking forward to the ride ahead.
I love this narrative... this story. It helped awaken me and so many others.