What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
The fed.gov only exists because of the agreement between the States that created it. Hence, the States (and therefore We The People) are the rightful masters of the fed. Not the other way around. It's high time we got back to that and slay the leviathan that the fed has become. Literally rip out its teeth and talons.
AKA the 10th Amendment
If we take back our towns & counties and once again control the committeeman process, WE get to choose whose papers are walked to get onto the ballot. It was always the responsibility of we, the people, to do that AND then to watch carefully what each and every public servant does that came from our towns and counties. Elected public servants (probably with a few exceptions) will never police themselves. We KNOW what power does and there are always people ready to threaten, coerce and/or pay off weak public servants.
Consider how a county, with a strong constitutional sheriff, can respond to state or federal crap. This is how it begins, from individual to family, to neighborhood, to town, to county.