What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
AND the people to learn what they were never taught about their rightful place and power to take back their towns and counties, ensure that we have truly constitutional sheriffs--they're as ignorant as the rest of us, and take back the committeeman process which was stolen from us by the parties....It 's our duty but how many of us have any idea at all what to do?
I'm learning as fast as I can.
Those are words I love to hear.