What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
The public attention span is that of a goldfish, civics is no longer taught in schools, and we have a hostile media and a shadow gov actively fighting us. Anything to bring state's rights into the public psyche, esp with a case as big as Roe which is penetrating left wing echo chambers because of nonstop coverage in the left wing media is moving the ball down the field. Sadly it doesn't matter what you or I think - the collective sway of public opinion will matter in the long run. Racking up more and more victories for states rights will start to hammer the concept through some thick skulls.