If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (253)
sorted by:
Q is a COIN that will never, ever, ever be confirmed to the public. The q "proofs" are such an example. They are "plausible deniable" way to believe in Q for the public. The Q op needs a "plausible deniable" way to not believe in Q. I think this is where the HBO documentary comes into play. They heavily lean on Watkins and Ron being the minds behind Q to increase 8kuns popularity. This "plausible deniable out" to the Q operation is designed opposite to the plausible deniable "Trump tweet proofs".
I think a more prominent question would be why won't it ever be public? Because then you're leveraging your own military against a brainwashed local population which is a Grey area that folks might not like?
It would basically generate the question, "Why is the new power structure better than the old power structure.
Much as the problem/insurgency is clandestine and overt in nature, so too must be the cure? It must be an organic decision willingly chosen by the populace without force.
Anyways that's my best guess.
Wasn’t the question about finding out “who you’ve been talking to” posed?