If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (253)
sorted by:
My other prediction is we will see more plausible deniablity on both sides of the operation:
more Jim/Ron fuckery, and
more Q->Trump 0minute corresponding message deltas
Can I ask why Q needs plausible deniability?
If Trump is in control, and “we have it all”, and the White Hats have the game in the bag, and NCSWIC…
…then exactly who is Q afraid of being exposed to? Is Q afraid of the Deep State?
Is Q and the Plan so fragile that Q’s mere identity being exposed Can Stop What Is Coming?
If Q is right, he doesn’t need plausible deniability. He’s doing the right thing for the right reasons, and can apparently prove it, since “we have it all.” He doesn’t need to be afraid of a court system when Trump is back in charge.
And besides, since everyone in the Cabal apparently knows each other, it’s probably not hard for them to figure out the few people out there from Trump’s sphere who are not members of the club.
If the Deep State was that bad, they could narrow the list of Trump-supporting people with the necessary credentials pretty easily and wipe everyone off the map.
If they can’t do that, then Q has no reason to stay hidden.
Plausible deniability is used to protect Important Figures from being associated with Terrible Things.
So if this whole thing is really in the bag, and Q is who he claims to be, then I don’t see the point of plausible deniability, especially when Q’s identity as a high-ranking military or intelligence operative would benefit this movement ENORMOUSLY.
Because: dictator
You're trying to get people to willingly renounce their brain washing.
As soon as ots known military did this happens you birth a whole millenia of muh dictator.