From what I understand on that case, which is little right now. It seems that the outcome of this case is about who has Authority to govern we the people. This is all I know for now.
It's whether government agencies can regulate specific things without congress approval, hence there is no congressional oversight kinda like the CIA. I believe the argument here is who has the power to regulate, federal agency vs congress. I think this is bigger than we think because this would include the FED also. The whole monetary system. Congress would have more power, but it goes with the same as roe vs Wade, states have the right to regulate themselves and make their own laws, but with this overturned it should mean that states do not have to abide by any federal regulation/agencys laws, etc
From what I understand on that case, which is little right now. It seems that the outcome of this case is about who has Authority to govern we the people. This is all I know for now.
It's whether government agencies can regulate specific things without congress approval, hence there is no congressional oversight kinda like the CIA. I believe the argument here is who has the power to regulate, federal agency vs congress. I think this is bigger than we think because this would include the FED also. The whole monetary system. Congress would have more power, but it goes with the same as roe vs Wade, states have the right to regulate themselves and make their own laws, but with this overturned it should mean that states do not have to abide by any federal regulation/agencys laws, etc