Yes, I'm new... Or (rather) this is a relatively new account. I've read here forever. Started with Corsi (you know how that ended). Switched to X22report and Praying Medic. Ok, enough of that.

To be respectful, I'm putting this here as a post instead of responding to the numerous "fake Q" claims. The thing is, Q was never one person to begin with, as far as anyone claimed in the past. Consequently, citing grammatical differences (differences that WOULD be corrected by nefarious intelligence professionals anyway) probably shouldn't be used in attempts to substantiate claims about a "fake" Q. You'll need something else, like ethical inconsistencies, lack of proofs coordinated with the Trump team or lack of trip code.

In regard to the trip code, I have now seen utter speculation and ad hominems directed at 8kun operators used in attempts to invalidate a valid trip code. Personally, I would feel swindled if I ever allowed myself to accept ad hominems and pure speculation in exchange for accurate facts (like a valid code). Unacceptable.

So, if you want to become a debunker, at least use solid facts in that crusade. Debunking, however, is its own "rabbit hole", or (rather) its own trap, when ego begins to demand ever thinner support to prop up attitudes and assertions to which the debunker becomes emotionally attached. Debunking, as far as I can tell, is no more rational than faith-based acceptance. Not that faith is bad: just that it's a choice and not a factual discovery.

Good luck!