I'm sure those boys spent countless hours virtually murdering people in call of duty, but if they see a beautiful woman then apparently she needs to be arrested.
Pornography is the distribution of sexual material.
Exploitation means to take resources from someone.
By dictionary definition she did neither.
She wasn't doing anything sexual in those videos.
Women breastfeed babies and even children up to age 7.
If she had forced herself onto the boys physically then definitely, she would need to be charged with a crime.
If there was any evidence of her doing any actual harm to the children, then she would need to be punished.
If there is a psychological report from a counselor where the children say they were harmed or felt uncomfortable, then she would need to be punished.
She's an idiot to have livestreamed it, however.
By all means stop pedo's, but know the difference between what is natural and benign vs what is actually harmful.
You can't have a free society and punish simple nudity. Doesn't work that way.
Don't grandstand about freedom and civil rights when you punish people for exercising them.
Additionally her actions are covered by free speech laws.
It's the intent that matters. Someone's bathing attire slipping off after plunging off the high dive is practically a right of passage. That's an innocent mistake. But intentionally exposing yourself is something else entirely. If a man can get arrested for flashing his penis to children, a woman would face the same consequences as flashing her breasts. Equality, bitch.
Typical draconian conservatism.
I'm sure those boys spent countless hours virtually murdering people in call of duty, but if they see a beautiful woman then apparently she needs to be arrested.
Pornography is the distribution of sexual material.
Exploitation means to take resources from someone.
By dictionary definition she did neither.
She wasn't doing anything sexual in those videos.
Women breastfeed babies and even children up to age 7.
If she had forced herself onto the boys physically then definitely, she would need to be charged with a crime.
If there was any evidence of her doing any actual harm to the children, then she would need to be punished.
If there is a psychological report from a counselor where the children say they were harmed or felt uncomfortable, then she would need to be punished.
She's an idiot to have livestreamed it, however.
By all means stop pedo's, but know the difference between what is natural and benign vs what is actually harmful.
You can't have a free society and punish simple nudity. Doesn't work that way.
Don't grandstand about freedom and civil rights when you punish people for exercising them.
Additionally her actions are covered by free speech laws.
It's the intent that matters. Someone's bathing attire slipping off after plunging off the high dive is practically a right of passage. That's an innocent mistake. But intentionally exposing yourself is something else entirely. If a man can get arrested for flashing his penis to children, a woman would face the same consequences as flashing her breasts. Equality, bitch.
Penis != Breasts. Men have breasts and they are not charged for walking around shirtless. That is not equality.
Oh fuck off, you obstinate cunt. I shouldn't have to explain to you the difference between a woman's breasts and a dude's flabby chest.
You need to go back to school to learn the difference between a penis and breasts. Take some anger management lessons while you are at it.