Maybe this seems like nothing. But it's definitely something. Let me explain:
Signs are pointing to white hats moving in the FBI. Clearly the Bureau has been in dire need of a clean up for a loooong time, and now we see some good news in how the feebs will choose to respond to the outpouring of violence from the godless supporters of Moloch in the wake of the amazing SCOTUS Roe victory.
QUESTION: Why should we care about this article? Doesn't it state that the FBI issued guidance for local police orgs to report anti-abortion "extremists" who want to cause property damage to abortion "clinics"/dungeons" and attack abortion providers? Isn't the article saying the FBI will harass and prosecute pro-lifers, same as usual?
Yep. BUT:
On the other hand: Forces inside the FBI are issuing directives that abortion lovers and their violent rioting must be considered DOMESTIC TERRORISM. Which it clearly is.
So why be happy instead of saying "meh"? Isn't it just a 50/50 split between good and evil?
One of my primary areas of research is FBI chicanery. Bureaucratic language often hides intentions and actions, but the responses to the FBI are important in discerning who is affected and how. Throw a rock into a pack of dogs and the one that yelps is the one that got hit. So let's look at how people are responding to the new FBI directives.
Here's how the baby-killers are responding:
(1) Left wing former feeb Mike German whines that: “now any police department ... can use this as an opportunity to go target pro-choice groups because they look at any kind of disruptive activity like marches and sit-ins as terrorism [and] they tend to overreact to those incidents,”
(2) Libtard pink professor Amanda Shanor, cries: “My concern is that, whatever the FBI’s initial goals, this may lead to a program that surveils people and organizations with strong views on reproductive rights based on their First Amendment protected activities"
So who are the anti-abortion people gnashing their teeth and wailing over the new laws? None. Because we aren't glowies who kill abortion providers or bomb clinics.
QUESTION: why is FBi moving against pro-death protestors? ANSWER: Because of DHS pressure.
DHS bulletin states;
"Some domestic violent extremists (DVEs) will likely exploit the recent US Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe V. Wade to intensify violence against a wide range of targets, We expect violence could occur for weeks following the release, particularly as DVEs may be mobilized to respond to changes in state laws and ballot measures on abortion stemming from the decision.”
Pro-Roe Moloch worshippers are now being called out as DVEs.
BIG PICTURE:
Fifth dimensional chess Trump style: they think they stole his election, but his SCOTUS reverses Roe. His friendlies in the DHS pressure the feebs and clear a space for white hats in the org to join the fight against the pussy-hat crew and their temper tantrum riots. Meaning, Trump created the end of Roe and he is protectting the nation from the aftermath of the ruling.
How BIGLY is that?
This is one microcosmic example of the macro plan. So:
Tell the doomers we're on the WINNING team. You can focus on Resident Xiden's incompetent wickedness or you can focus on the fulfillment of TRUMP'S PROMISES. All of this has been planned and put in place under the radar of many. More victories are coming that are going to show us more of the hidden mechanisms that Trump has put in place. Be done with FUD, Patriots. You are seeing the fruits of Trump's labors and the Big Steal did NOTHING to prevent it.
Small things have big meaning. As someone who follows the FBI closely, you can trust me when I say that any move to stop shielding deep state leftists represents and important change in policy and a major change of culture inside the Bureau. This doesn't absolve the FBI or suggest that it's been cleansed. It's just one example to remind us all that the change is happening and Trump's enemies are always brought to heel.
Happy Independence Day, Patriots. NCSWIC
Moloch was an ancient God represented by a bull-headed man. I can't help thinking that the golden calf in Exodus was a version. The goat-headed god we call Baphomet seems to me a version of Pan, who was given human sacrifices into the Christian era. Tracing the exact lineage of these and other ancient gods is speculative and confusing, and no doubt the same or analogous gods often had different names in different cultures. What is clearer is that through the Old Testament there was a constant struggle by Yahweh to turn the Hebrews away from these monstrous idol deities and blood sacrifice. Moloch was particularly persistent. He required the sacrifice of a first-born. In Judaism this was softened to dedicating the child in the Temple, as Jesus was, and something else was killed. See Deuteronomy, think of God trying to make a group less murderous by strictly defining the spilling and consumption of blood. I suspect that vampirism and cannibalism were practiced too and God was also trying to stop this.
So to get back to your question, I think Moloch represents a very bad idea, that blood will buy worldly value and propitiate the forces of the universe. It's an idea found in many other cultures too. Whether there is a particular entity that is Moloch is beside the point. He represents the opposite of what God wants. Is he really Satan? Is he a Nephilim? Is he a tool of unscrupulous priests sucking food and gold from their flock with tricks? Any of these should be rejected. All of them are destructive, not creative.