For the first article, what you’ve found is a therapist who fucked up. You will get no argument from me that there are incompetent therapists and ones who drop the ball. It’s a big field, and mentally unstable people are an unpredictable group of people.
Is there any evidence in this story (or any other related documents) that prove this therapist deliberately allowed or encouraged this violence to happen?
How have you ruled out this being a therapist who fucked up? How would you know if it was or wasn’t, besides faith that Q said there is something being hidden here?
For the second article, I’m confused. Can you show me where in the article it says that therapists handed over their information to the FBI in order to target this young man?
It says they knew he was schizophrenic. It also says that he was declared legally incompetent and hospitalized numerous times, which would be recorded in legal records, not just medical records.
In fact, the parents blame legal records people, or someone associated with them. They don’t mention a therapist.
The State of Oklahoma found him mentally incompetent and we, his parents have legal guardianship over him by the Court. These documents are sealed from the public, which is why no news media outlet has been able to obtain them.
These types of records would go far beyond the patient records of a therapist.
FBI have access to legal records, and frankly, I can tell you from experience that people with untreated schizophrenia are not exactly hard to identify. They had an informant talking to him. Of course they knew he was mentally ill.
If you’re trying to bait me into defending the FBI targeting mentally ill people… good luck.
Why do you assume merely by the FBI having information about a legally-relevant and super-obvious psychiatric condition that it must have been a result of a betrayal by this therapist?
Is it because Q suggested this as a research avenue, and you have faith in Q’s theory of a conspiracy involving these therapists?
These are the sorts of assumptions I don’t make, but I think they’re easier to make if someone you trust, like Q, told you to look closely.
I am willing to examine the claims of sources I do not trust, but if you said that Q researchers have provided the Hard Proof for Q’s claims on this, I’d still like to see that.
I don’t even see evidence that either of these therapists were Satanist or Communist. Can you provide that proof, at least? Have the Q researchers found proof of these two therapists’ allegiances to Satan?
You misunderstand. I 100% believe people are capable of evil.
In fact, I believe that humans are capable of random acts of evil, like mass shootings.
But I would say back to you that it’s difficult for us to talk if you refuse to believe that human beings can be fallible, and not every single action that enables or even propagates evil must be the result of a coordinated campaign to cause evil.
Do you believe that people are fundamentally incapable of random acts of evil? That in a country of over 300,000,000 people, and enough guns for all of them, a rare few aren’t going to do irrational things with them?
Is that impossible?
Sometimes, even most times, people fuck up. People do things randomly. People are not always motivated by reason and logic, and people can be evil at an individual reason without a desire to fight the things you care about.
I accept this. I have often experienced such people firsthand. I know how absolutely chaotic such people can be and how much confusion they can leave behind.
But you prefer to think of this evil as being contained under a single banner, identified and understood in whole by a champion, whose mastery of reality and control of its unimaginably complex variables must literally rival that of a god.
I just think that perspective is far simpler than my own.
But please remember that an illogical society is not an illogical world. The world doesn’t make much more sense without Q than it does with Q. You might feel that you have more answers, but at the end of the day, you and I are both still sitting together, still waiting for the Storm to hit in the way that Q promised.
I’m out of time, but I enjoyed this conversation and appreciate the time you took for it. I will read any reply you send. I know that you don’t believe me, but I do learn from your perspectives on the issues we discuss.
For the first article, what you’ve found is a therapist who fucked up. You will get no argument from me that there are incompetent therapists and ones who drop the ball. It’s a big field, and mentally unstable people are an unpredictable group of people.
Is there any evidence in this story (or any other related documents) that prove this therapist deliberately allowed or encouraged this violence to happen?
How have you ruled out this being a therapist who fucked up? How would you know if it was or wasn’t, besides faith that Q said there is something being hidden here?
For the second article, I’m confused. Can you show me where in the article it says that therapists handed over their information to the FBI in order to target this young man?
It says they knew he was schizophrenic. It also says that he was declared legally incompetent and hospitalized numerous times, which would be recorded in legal records, not just medical records.
In fact, the parents blame legal records people, or someone associated with them. They don’t mention a therapist.
These types of records would go far beyond the patient records of a therapist.
FBI have access to legal records, and frankly, I can tell you from experience that people with untreated schizophrenia are not exactly hard to identify. They had an informant talking to him. Of course they knew he was mentally ill.
If you’re trying to bait me into defending the FBI targeting mentally ill people… good luck.
Why do you assume merely by the FBI having information about a legally-relevant and super-obvious psychiatric condition that it must have been a result of a betrayal by this therapist?
Is it because Q suggested this as a research avenue, and you have faith in Q’s theory of a conspiracy involving these therapists?
These are the sorts of assumptions I don’t make, but I think they’re easier to make if someone you trust, like Q, told you to look closely.
I am willing to examine the claims of sources I do not trust, but if you said that Q researchers have provided the Hard Proof for Q’s claims on this, I’d still like to see that.
I don’t even see evidence that either of these therapists were Satanist or Communist. Can you provide that proof, at least? Have the Q researchers found proof of these two therapists’ allegiances to Satan?
You misunderstand. I 100% believe people are capable of evil.
In fact, I believe that humans are capable of random acts of evil, like mass shootings.
But I would say back to you that it’s difficult for us to talk if you refuse to believe that human beings can be fallible, and not every single action that enables or even propagates evil must be the result of a coordinated campaign to cause evil.
Do you believe that people are fundamentally incapable of random acts of evil? That in a country of over 300,000,000 people, and enough guns for all of them, a rare few aren’t going to do irrational things with them?
Is that impossible?
Sometimes, even most times, people fuck up. People do things randomly. People are not always motivated by reason and logic, and people can be evil at an individual reason without a desire to fight the things you care about.
I accept this. I have often experienced such people firsthand. I know how absolutely chaotic such people can be and how much confusion they can leave behind.
But you prefer to think of this evil as being contained under a single banner, identified and understood in whole by a champion, whose mastery of reality and control of its unimaginably complex variables must literally rival that of a god.
I just think that perspective is far simpler than my own.
But please remember that an illogical society is not an illogical world. The world doesn’t make much more sense without Q than it does with Q. You might feel that you have more answers, but at the end of the day, you and I are both still sitting together, still waiting for the Storm to hit in the way that Q promised.
I’m out of time, but I enjoyed this conversation and appreciate the time you took for it. I will read any reply you send. I know that you don’t believe me, but I do learn from your perspectives on the issues we discuss.