So, I was typing up and formatting notes for a bit of something I have. It is regarding politics. A section that I have written down reads:

"Right now, the Democrats are being crippled, with regards to election chances, with their constant crises, embarrassments, and ineffectiveness."

I was tempted to include malice or malevolence in that list within the section, even though I distantly remember malice nor malevolence being part of the list. I also remember the notion of Hanlon's razor, which states: "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

This brings me to the point and question I wish to impost onto GW: Lately, both on here and on PDW, there has been a large uptick of posts that call the constant crises that we are suffering through right now is a result of evil. The question are as follows:

Is there a hazard associated with labeling an outcome or event a result of evil or malice? Hanlon's Razor came into fruition for a reason and I wonder if we are driving to a potential danger from ignoring Hanlon's Razor and labeling the enemy's actions as evil rather than incompetence?