Who's downvoting like crazy?
I lose a little respect for Candace every time she gives them a platform.
I lost all respect for Candace after she continues to defend Andrew Tate, attempting to normalize him amongst her fans and MAGA.
Even wrote an essay on GAW calling her a viper; got a bunch of salty GAW-users mad and massively downvoted.
Leeching scamming con-artists who are self-confessed women-beaters, sex-traffickers, rapists and pimping pedophiles.
DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THEIR CLAIMS TO BE MAGA. THEY ARE FOUL VIPERS LOOKING FOR SUCKERS (FROM THE MAGA MOVEMENT) TO BE THEIR HUMAN-SHIELD AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT OF THEIR CRIMES.
EXPEL THESE MONSTERS FROM OUR MOVEMENT!
I am fully aware of the insurance situation, but you didn't answer my researching question:
Assuming money is not an issue, if the LA Fires were to be put out tomorrow completely and you were given one of the lots with a burnt out husks to turn into a multi-million dollar property, how long will it take to accomplish the task?
So, I want to know if there is any architects, engineers, contractors, etc. on this forum that can give me a second opinion with regards to the LA Fire.
I have asked a friend of mine, who is an architect, a question: assuming money is not an issue, if the LA Fires were to be put out tomorrow completely and you were given one of the lots with a burnt out husks to turn into a multi-million dollar property, how long will it take to accomplish the task?
He gave a estimate of a half a decade, so five years for one lot/property.
I said four and he said that is also a reasonable estimate, assuming things go well.
There is also a real-estate agent who did an interview on FOX news, and was imposed a similar question: he said three years for the whole process.
So, what is your opinion/estimates? Assuming money is not an issue, if the LA Fires were to be put out tomorrow completely and you were given one of the lots with a burnt out husks to turn into a multi-million dollar property, how long will it take to accomplish the task?
NEITHER THE CASE NOR THE EVIDENCE ARE THROWN OUT. ANYBODY SAYING THAT THE CASE IS DISMISSED ARE BEING FOOLED BY TATE'S LIES!
CHARGES ARE NOT DISMISSED
https://greatawakening.win/p/1994fX0r3u/this-clippost-is-the-nail-in-the/c/
Quick reminder to GAW that Andrew Tate is on Trial for human sex trafficking and trafficking of minors.
If I need to hear that the UK is taken over by Satanists, I would not hear it from a sex trafficker.
So all of this sentencing is a complete nothing burger.
Honest question:
There are people over at Truth Social melting down over over the sentencing tomorrow, saying that the Demonic Rats are planning something evil with the convicted felon label on Trump.
But what kind of damage that label will do to Trump, in all seriousness? The 14 Amendment says that Trump can only be prohibited from taking office through a conviction on insurrection, which is not in this case. And if they dare to impeach him again over this, it will get shot down in a hurry, and seal their doom on their political future.
I am genuinely curious if there is an angle that the melting downers are getting and I don't.
Or a clickbaiting grifter trying to lie to get clicks.
Damn it people! It does our movement bad if we lie and attempt to pass off 10+ year old news as recent!
So the fear that Trump's gonna have a major roadblock on his Drill-baby-drill agenda is unwarranted, correct?
Fraud vitiates everything.
That's the kind of non-straight answer I wish to avoid. Please answer my question seriously.
No one is arguing that fraud vitates everything, but I am not talking about the inevitable future that will come in years in the future, I am talking about the here and now, preferably within the first hundred days of Trump's presidency, the critical period where Trump needs to show results right out of the gate to prove that he is the man for the job.
Quick and serious question I want to ask, since I am not getting a straight answer elsewhere:
I am aware that Biden has thrown a possible monkey wrench into Trump's agenda by issuing a permanent ban on Offshore Oil and Gas drilling. While Trump, very publicly, promised a very swift and quick reversal of this ban, the Gateway Pundit has this to say:
But unlike traditional executive actions, Trump will face an arduous process in trying to override Biden’s latest act of sabotage. A 2019 court ruling states that Presidents do not have the authority to overturn prior bans issued under The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
In the that case, Trump lost a bid to reverse Arctic and Atlantic Ocean bans made by Barack Obama near the end of his presidency.
So it is assessment time and I want GAW's second opinion:
is what the Gateway Pundit said is true and Trump might have a rougher time to fulfill his promise to reverse this ban quickly than anticipated?
or
is what the Gateway Pundit said is false or exaggerated (they have been known and shown to sensationalize, exaggerate, and click bait often) and the Trump actually do have the powers to fulfill his promise to get this spiteful act from Biden undone quickly?
But unlike traditional executive actions, Trump will face an arduous process in trying to override Biden’s latest act of sabotage. A 2019 court ruling states that Presidents do not have the authority to overturn prior bans issued under The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
In the that case, Trump lost a bid to reverse Arctic and Atlantic Ocean bans made by Barack Obama near the end of his presidency.
Press X to doubt
More to the point, I bet that even Trump can't get it override , maybe Congress can pass a bill to get it fixed.
Thank you, AmericanThinker, for highlighting the fact that there are nefarious forces trying to cause a rift in the MAGA movement.
I have been seeing trolls and glowies attempting the same divide over at Truth Social. In addition to the obvious troll accounts demeaning Trump (the kind that is present before November 5th), it seemed that they have many undercover accounts that posed as Patriots and are allowed to grow in followers and age (mainly through just pure mindless reposting of Patriot material with little original content).
Such undercover accounts are now being activated to cause chaos by forever renouncing Trump and going against him, all while spreading mischief here and there.
And they are all getting the block and mute from me. No, I don't care that you have three times or four times as many followers as me: the fact that you somehow decided to jump off the Trump train over an issue that will probably be addressed in Trump's administrations anyway means you are the enemy and were never fren (and I bet that you gained those followers illegitimately).
So, which means that the ATF can be disbanded through execuative order. Since they are part of the executive branch, DOGE can mass-layoff them, correct?
Is he really importing Indians?
Trump wants the best and brightest, regardless of race. Never recalled him saying he wants Indians, period.
Since people are asking for a Bible Verse, here is one:
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.
Matthew 7:15 ESV
I have seen videos of EV fires and videos of the attempted bombing of the Trump Hotel. What happened at the Trump hotel is very definitely not just a mere batter fire/explosion. It is way too fast and sudden. It looked very much like a car-bomb.
Additional police drone footage inspecting the remains of the Cybertruck (especially what's in the back) reveal remains of gasoline canisters, camping fuel containers (some of the remains have the camping supplier Coleman's logo still visible) and dangerously explosive fireworks: typical ordinance used by car-bombs, and all in large enough amounts that implicates ill-intent by the driver.
Happy new year, everyone.
but it’s possible that it’s largely confined to specific regions and larger cities.
Thinking about it, this statement might be closer to the truth than you might think.
Kind of noticing that many of the complaints of Indians taking their jobs away are from the IT fields at the more major corporations.
It is probable that many of these major corporations will be based in the larger cities in places where, historically, are hubs for business and tech, like New York and Silicon Valley in California.
These places are captured by Democrat politicians who are usually America last and are willing to replace Americans with foreigners readily. So it is not surprising that many of these companies are influenced by their Democrat neighbors and their corrupt policies.
A reasonable conclusion is that, if we want to combat this American last attitude in our business and computer industries, we might need to have new competitive technology companies be founded outside of these Democrat-controlled territories. God-willing, with Trump's economic policies of bringing back manufacturing and jobs back to the states away from the likes of China, there will be plenty of opportunities for entrepreneurial MAGA-men to start up new companies.
Where exactly did President Trump say he would import 100 million people?
Bingo.
I got the feeling that many people who is harping about Trump betraying America First have gasllit themselves into believing that Trump will replace the Average American with Indians, or foreigners in large groups uncountable like the grains of sand on a beach.
NEVER had Trump said nor imply he would swamp America with foreigners.
What is going on?
I am a bit away from my computer, so I can't check what's happening on X.