I'll be honest with my opinion about a few things. The ridiculous 'food safety' standards in other countries along with the bacteria / germ scare that happened with it always felt overly excessive and hearing about all these allergies to things like nuts or some type of food just sounds silly to me. It makes me think these people are so frail that the wind would knock them over dead or they are being severely misdiagnosed.
I live in Asia where there are slabs of raw meat out in the open market that you buy and eat. When people are poor, they can't be picky about their meals. Food is left on the table for 8+ hours and not rushed to the fridge within a 2 hour limit. Fermented food is a thing yet in some countries, people freak out over bacteria spreading from raw chicken washed in a sink.
Just makes me think some areas are just poisoned more than others or the propaganda and scare tactics is just tuned up to 11. It all looks and sounds silly from an outsider's perspective.
BPS has been found to interfere with mammalian hormonal activity.
To a greater extent than BPA, BPS alters nerve cell creation in the zebrafish hypothalamus and causes behavioral hyperactivity in exposed zebrafish larvae (Molina-Molina et al., 2013; Kinch et al., 2015).
These latter results were observed at the extremely low chemical concentrations of 0.0068uM.
This is 1,000-fold lower than the official U.S. levels of acceptable human exposure.
The dose was chosen by the researchers since it is the concentration of BPA in the river that passes their laboratory.
Studies show micro doses of certain plastics cause cancer or other conditions while big doses have no or a lesser effects
EPA admits this on certain chemicals
Jan 25, 2022
Studies also have shown that chronic exposure to low doses of certain POPs can result in reproductive and immune system deficits. Exposure to high levels of certain POPs chemicals - higher than normally encountered by humans and wildlife - can cause serious damage or death.
Abstract There are currently various concerns regarding certain environmental toxins and the possible impact they can have on developmental diseases.
Glyphosate (Gly) is the most utilised herbicide in agriculture, although its widespread use is generating controversy in the scientific world because of its probable carcinogenic effect on human cells.
Gly performs as an inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phospate synthase (EPSP synthase), not only in plants, but also in bacteria.
An inhibiting effect on EPSP synthase from intestinal microbiota has been reported, affecting mainly beneficial bacteria.
To the contrary, Clostridium spp. and Salmonella strains are shown to be resistant to Gly.
Consequently, researchers have suggested that Gly can cause dysbiosis, a phenomenon which is characterised by an imbalance between beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms.
The overgrowth of bacteria such as clostridia generates high levels of noxious metabolites in the brain, which can contribute to the development of neurological deviations.
This work reviews the impact of Gly-induced intestinal dysbiosis on the central nervous system, focusing on emotional, neurological and neurodegenerative disorders.
Secrecy— They disclose EPA meeting minutes of a secret high level dioxins working group that admitted dioxins are extraordinarily poisonous chemicals. The internal minutes contradict the Agency’s longstanding refusal to regulate dioxins or set legal limits.
Collusion— They demonstrate EPA collusion with the pulp and paper industry to “suppress, modify, or delay” the results of the congressionally-mandated National Dioxin Study, which found high levels of dioxins in everyday products, such as baby diapers and coffee filters, as well as pulp and paper mill effluents.
Deception— They provide important new data on the infamous Industrial Bio-Test (IBT) scandal. By the late 1970s, it was known that more than 800 safety studies performed by IBT on 140 chemicals produced by 38 chemical manufacturers were nonexistent, fraudulent, or invalid. The Poison Papers, however, show that EPA and its Canadian counterpart, the Health Protection Branch (HPB), colluded with pesticide manufacturers, to keep invalidly registered products on the market and covered up problems with many IBT tests.
Cover-up— The papers also show that EPA staff had evidence that this IBT scandal involved more independent testing companies and more products than ever officially acknowledged.
Concealment— The papers show that EPA concealed and falsely discredited its own studies finding high levels of dioxin — 2,3,7,8-TCDD — in environmental samples and human breast milk following routine use of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T (Agent Orange) by the federal Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management.
Intent— They show Monsanto chief medical officer George Roush admitted under oath to knowing that Monsanto studies into the health effects of dioxins on workers were written up untruthfully for the scientific literature such as to obscure health effects. These fraudulent studies were heavily relied upon by EPA to avoid regulating dioxin. They also were relied upon to defend manufacturers in lawsuits brought by veterans claiming damages from exposure to Agent Orange
I'll be honest with my opinion about a few things. The ridiculous 'food safety' standards in other countries along with the bacteria / germ scare that happened with it always felt overly excessive and hearing about all these allergies to things like nuts or some type of food just sounds silly to me. It makes me think these people are so frail that the wind would knock them over dead or they are being severely misdiagnosed.
I live in Asia where there are slabs of raw meat out in the open market that you buy and eat. When people are poor, they can't be picky about their meals. Food is left on the table for 8+ hours and not rushed to the fridge within a 2 hour limit. Fermented food is a thing yet in some countries, people freak out over bacteria spreading from raw chicken washed in a sink.
Just makes me think some areas are just poisoned more than others or the propaganda and scare tactics is just tuned up to 11. It all looks and sounds silly from an outsider's perspective.
Most foods allergies are due to Vaccinations in the west
Yeah, but parasites and worms in my food aren't something many people want.
Certainly not me or for my family.
BPS has been found to interfere with mammalian hormonal activity.
To a greater extent than BPA, BPS alters nerve cell creation in the zebrafish hypothalamus and causes behavioral hyperactivity in exposed zebrafish larvae (Molina-Molina et al., 2013; Kinch et al., 2015).
These latter results were observed at the extremely low chemical concentrations of 0.0068uM.
This is 1,000-fold lower than the official U.S. levels of acceptable human exposure.
The dose was chosen by the researchers since it is the concentration of BPA in the river that passes their laboratory.
https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/unsafe-at-any-dose-diagnosing-chemical-safety-failures-from-ddt-to-bpa/
Studies show micro doses of certain plastics cause cancer or other conditions while big doses have no or a lesser effects
EPA admits this on certain chemicals
Jan 25, 2022
Studies also have shown that chronic exposure to low doses of certain POPs can result in reproductive and immune system deficits. Exposure to high levels of certain POPs chemicals - higher than normally encountered by humans and wildlife - can cause serious damage or death.
https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/persistent-organic-pollutants-global-issue-global-response
Gut microbiota and neurological effects of glyphosate Lola Rueda-Ruzafa et al. Neurotoxicology. 2019 Dec.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31442459/
Abstract There are currently various concerns regarding certain environmental toxins and the possible impact they can have on developmental diseases.
Glyphosate (Gly) is the most utilised herbicide in agriculture, although its widespread use is generating controversy in the scientific world because of its probable carcinogenic effect on human cells.
Gly performs as an inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phospate synthase (EPSP synthase), not only in plants, but also in bacteria.
An inhibiting effect on EPSP synthase from intestinal microbiota has been reported, affecting mainly beneficial bacteria.
To the contrary, Clostridium spp. and Salmonella strains are shown to be resistant to Gly.
Consequently, researchers have suggested that Gly can cause dysbiosis, a phenomenon which is characterised by an imbalance between beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms.
The overgrowth of bacteria such as clostridia generates high levels of noxious metabolites in the brain, which can contribute to the development of neurological deviations.
This work reviews the impact of Gly-induced intestinal dysbiosis on the central nervous system, focusing on emotional, neurological and neurodegenerative disorders.
A wide variety of
Maybe the reason all the food plants are burning down. They are poisoning us!
Some of what the Poison Papers Reveal:
Secrecy— They disclose EPA meeting minutes of a secret high level dioxins working group that admitted dioxins are extraordinarily poisonous chemicals. The internal minutes contradict the Agency’s longstanding refusal to regulate dioxins or set legal limits.
Collusion— They demonstrate EPA collusion with the pulp and paper industry to “suppress, modify, or delay” the results of the congressionally-mandated National Dioxin Study, which found high levels of dioxins in everyday products, such as baby diapers and coffee filters, as well as pulp and paper mill effluents.
Deception— They provide important new data on the infamous Industrial Bio-Test (IBT) scandal. By the late 1970s, it was known that more than 800 safety studies performed by IBT on 140 chemicals produced by 38 chemical manufacturers were nonexistent, fraudulent, or invalid. The Poison Papers, however, show that EPA and its Canadian counterpart, the Health Protection Branch (HPB), colluded with pesticide manufacturers, to keep invalidly registered products on the market and covered up problems with many IBT tests.
Cover-up— The papers also show that EPA staff had evidence that this IBT scandal involved more independent testing companies and more products than ever officially acknowledged.
Concealment— The papers show that EPA concealed and falsely discredited its own studies finding high levels of dioxin — 2,3,7,8-TCDD — in environmental samples and human breast milk following routine use of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T (Agent Orange) by the federal Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management.
Intent— They show Monsanto chief medical officer George Roush admitted under oath to knowing that Monsanto studies into the health effects of dioxins on workers were written up untruthfully for the scientific literature such as to obscure health effects. These fraudulent studies were heavily relied upon by EPA to avoid regulating dioxin. They also were relied upon to defend manufacturers in lawsuits brought by veterans claiming damages from exposure to Agent Orange