So, that's Breitbarts headline... It alludes to progressives bait and switch about the Florida/Disney "don't say gay" thing from a few months back
APs headline from April 13, the article cited, does not say this. AP certainly dives through hoops to mislead and straight up lies, but they did not say this as far as I can tell.
How so? Did you read the same Apr 12 fact check article I did? Not the Breitbart article - the fact check that it links to.
Would you not summarize the article thusly? "The AP thinks it's fine to sexualize little kids, as long as you're not actively trying to fuck them. Only if you're trying to fuck them is it "grooming", otherwise it's just "education""
So, if you're writing an article about the AP saying it's fine, how is
"AP Fact Check: It's not 'grooming' to sexualize little kids away from their parents"
a little misleading?
What SPECIFICALLY is misleading?
AP 'Fact Check' -well, it definitely came from an AP fact check, so that's not it...
Is it the word grooming? Do you concur with the AP that teaching little kids about anal sex, how to give blowjobs, and "gender is a construct" would not be considered 'grooming' them?
Is it the word sexualization? Do you concur with the AP that teaching little kids sex is not sexualization?
Is it the phrase "away from their parents"?
I'm really trying to wrap my head around your opinion, but it's not patently obvious to me.
So, that's Breitbarts headline... It alludes to progressives bait and switch about the Florida/Disney "don't say gay" thing from a few months back
APs headline from April 13, the article cited, does not say this. AP certainly dives through hoops to mislead and straight up lies, but they did not say this as far as I can tell.
That part of the headline was not in quotes - it's a summarization of the overall fact check, not a direct quote.
Yes but it's a little misleading
How so? Did you read the same Apr 12 fact check article I did? Not the Breitbart article - the fact check that it links to.
Would you not summarize the article thusly? "The AP thinks it's fine to sexualize little kids, as long as you're not actively trying to fuck them. Only if you're trying to fuck them is it "grooming", otherwise it's just "education""
So, if you're writing an article about the AP saying it's fine, how is
"AP Fact Check: It's not 'grooming' to sexualize little kids away from their parents"
a little misleading?
What SPECIFICALLY is misleading?
AP 'Fact Check' -well, it definitely came from an AP fact check, so that's not it...
Is it the word grooming? Do you concur with the AP that teaching little kids about anal sex, how to give blowjobs, and "gender is a construct" would not be considered 'grooming' them?
Is it the word sexualization? Do you concur with the AP that teaching little kids sex is not sexualization?
Is it the phrase "away from their parents"?
I'm really trying to wrap my head around your opinion, but it's not patently obvious to me.
Yes I did read the link from April 13th.
You can absolutely interpret it th the way you say
You can certainly paraphrase it that way.
And yes, in my eyes you are probably right to do so.
But my point is proven by some of the responses in this thread.
"Who wrote that headline?" for one.
I guess my point is by just posting the pic, it makes it seem as though that's a quote from the AP.