From what I understand, the CDC does not get to define what is, or is not, a vaxxine as a legal term. In fact, the CDC repeatedly since this plandemic started, has way overstepped its boundaries and started making policy - or so they have thought. But since most do not understand the purpose and scope of what the CDC is, and what its functions are, many just go along thinking they have more power than they actually do. They have no power other than what they have been allowed out of ignorance. The CDC can only make recommendations - they are not a regulatory body similar to OSHA. Therefore, a change in definition only goes as far as what is needed to make recommendations. Their definition of vaxxine, as far as I know, is not codified into law. The CDC's purpose is to monitor health in the US, which they have failed utterly with regards to the vaxxines and with regards to the entire plandemic.
I think this is an area that has not been well researched. I do not believe that the "legal" definition of the term vaxxine has been changed. If that is the case, there are a whole lot of people that are technically in violation of the law by trying to pass off a genetic therapy as a vaxxine. I don't care what the WHO or the CDC have defined the term as - it matters how the law defines it. They have been scamming everyone - including the courts - because no one has been pointing this out. If I can remember the interview where I heard this I will try to update this reply. I want to say it came from one of the lawyers working on some of the lawsuits or someone like David Martin.
The CDC is Not a Gov. agency and I am not a doctor. but from 3 years of common sense reading, this IS the greatest Crime in History. The Big Pharma/CDC/FDA/fauci/AMA and MSM HAVE KILLED more than any virus in history. IF this Proof of this LIE/fake Vacc. can be put in front of a Grand Jury the Guilty will Pay.
Exactly. All this talk and focus on the CDC or the WHO redefining the term vaxxine has nothing to do with what the legal definition of the term actually is. The CDC has changed the term so it can eventually make changes to the childhood vaxxine schedule recommendations. This they are doing at the behest of their real bosses - the pharmaceutical industry. It is all smoke and mirrors and the everyone, except the few of us with common sense, cannot smell the BS. I have worked with infection control in health care settings so I am somewhat familiar with these entities. Your are right - the CDC is not a government agency. It is a private organization that is privately and publicly funded and it's sole purpose is to help monitor the nation's health and to make recommendations. Those recommendations then go to agencies like OSHA or state governments that then have the power to regulate and make law.
Where is the class action?
From what I understand, the CDC does not get to define what is, or is not, a vaxxine as a legal term. In fact, the CDC repeatedly since this plandemic started, has way overstepped its boundaries and started making policy - or so they have thought. But since most do not understand the purpose and scope of what the CDC is, and what its functions are, many just go along thinking they have more power than they actually do. They have no power other than what they have been allowed out of ignorance. The CDC can only make recommendations - they are not a regulatory body similar to OSHA. Therefore, a change in definition only goes as far as what is needed to make recommendations. Their definition of vaxxine, as far as I know, is not codified into law. The CDC's purpose is to monitor health in the US, which they have failed utterly with regards to the vaxxines and with regards to the entire plandemic.
I think this is an area that has not been well researched. I do not believe that the "legal" definition of the term vaxxine has been changed. If that is the case, there are a whole lot of people that are technically in violation of the law by trying to pass off a genetic therapy as a vaxxine. I don't care what the WHO or the CDC have defined the term as - it matters how the law defines it. They have been scamming everyone - including the courts - because no one has been pointing this out. If I can remember the interview where I heard this I will try to update this reply. I want to say it came from one of the lawyers working on some of the lawsuits or someone like David Martin.
The CDC is Not a Gov. agency and I am not a doctor. but from 3 years of common sense reading, this IS the greatest Crime in History. The Big Pharma/CDC/FDA/fauci/AMA and MSM HAVE KILLED more than any virus in history. IF this Proof of this LIE/fake Vacc. can be put in front of a Grand Jury the Guilty will Pay.
Exactly. All this talk and focus on the CDC or the WHO redefining the term vaxxine has nothing to do with what the legal definition of the term actually is. The CDC has changed the term so it can eventually make changes to the childhood vaxxine schedule recommendations. This they are doing at the behest of their real bosses - the pharmaceutical industry. It is all smoke and mirrors and the everyone, except the few of us with common sense, cannot smell the BS. I have worked with infection control in health care settings so I am somewhat familiar with these entities. Your are right - the CDC is not a government agency. It is a private organization that is privately and publicly funded and it's sole purpose is to help monitor the nation's health and to make recommendations. Those recommendations then go to agencies like OSHA or state governments that then have the power to regulate and make law.
Peaceful TIM Mcvee is on the way!