it's ok not to understand anything about the Bible, as these ideas you've quoted suggest. They are often referred to by people who don't understand the text and don't want to engage with the idea of an omnipotent being existing at all - no hate, by all means, it's a matter of choice. But wouldn't you want to know about it better before inventing ideas that simply cannot align with its premise?
I do understand about an transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God..and as mark biglino and other researchers say he is not in the Bible . The Jews did not have a word for god or eternity at that time
oh please lol - the jews had a name for G-d in the Tetragrammaton which doesn't translate as "God" because it's a name for I AM - and every basic Bible scholar knows this. Researchers who say he's not in the Bible are engaged in rank sophistry. If you want to believe that level of research you might as well believe in flat earth.
it's ok not to understand anything about the Bible, as these ideas you've quoted suggest. They are often referred to by people who don't understand the text and don't want to engage with the idea of an omnipotent being existing at all - no hate, by all means, it's a matter of choice. But wouldn't you want to know about it better before inventing ideas that simply cannot align with its premise?
I do understand about an transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God..and as mark biglino and other researchers say he is not in the Bible . The Jews did not have a word for god or eternity at that time
oh please lol - the jews had a name for G-d in the Tetragrammaton which doesn't translate as "God" because it's a name for I AM - and every basic Bible scholar knows this. Researchers who say he's not in the Bible are engaged in rank sophistry. If you want to believe that level of research you might as well believe in flat earth.
Look...believe what you want to...if you want to worship Yahweh fill your boots!!