Patriots in control?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (180)
sorted by:
Alright alright, although “story” isn’t an uncommon way to describe an article, so you can forgive the confusion, I hope.
The official story is that the young man had already established an interest in terrorism, and the FBI does what it does with undercover ops and provided him fake bomb material.
The scandal would be if the FBI did this while believing him to be seriously mentally ill. The evidence on this, as was admitted to court, leaned against that. The only evidence in favor is the insistence of the parents.
So do I have a problem with the FBI giving potential terrorists enough rope to hang themselves with? Not in a sterile context, no.
Do I have a problem with the FBI knowingly manipulating the mentally ill to justify a crackdown on guns? Absolutely.
All the evidence could be a lie and it could be a coverup. But I have no evidence of that, and have known plenty of unstable people in my life capable of violence, so I don’t find anything particularly surprising in the evidence that actually exists and I can read about this case.
If there is something else you want me to find, we’ll need to co-research. I don’t mind digging into specific stories for details, but this board wouldn’t be necessary if any one person had time to dig into the Q layer of every news story. I’ll be happy to read any supplemental material that you think I may have missed.
I'm not really sure if you missed anything because I'm not sure. if I did either. But you didn't post any sources so I have no idea which articles you read. Heck, I don't even know which search engine you use; but also how would you describe love?
You can obviously understand my curiosity of your presence here over the past couple years.
I provided the primary court document source from the federal government, which was also the (unlinked and misrepresented) primary document source from your article, and all for a news story I don’t find to be particularly remarkable, only because you requested my thoughts on it. I’m sorry, but I don’t have time to do a dissertation on a random news story you find interesting without any reason to believe there’s anything to find.
As to the second question… I can’t even begin to know how to answer that, and with respect, I try not to get drawn into non-Q related philosophical discussions here. It’s just too many fronts to keep up with, and you and I both know the word “love” doesn’t even contain all the meanings that we attribute to the word.
So I don’t seem evasive, how about “commitment based on affection given without necessary transaction” or something silly like that?