The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building
Look up Institute of Northern Engineering. This is the most recent study that i know of. I think most think the NIST stuff is just silly. As far as sound, who knows what kind of explosives we have quietly developed. I don't know how else you get "the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building". I don't know how they took down these buildings, but I know the BS story the fake news and NIST has been peddling is just that. BS. It ranks up there with the covid hoax.
Dude, believe what you want. I thought this forum was for people who have finally realized what our govt. has been up to for decades. In 2001, and for a few years beyond, I believed, what the MSM was selling. Now, watching those towers fall, and thinking it is just a coincidence they all fell just like a controlled demolition, I have no words. Please, have the last word, but I will not respond any more to something that all can see with their own two eyes.
Even if it didn't have explosives I don't see how that building would be able to fall, let alone, perfectly like that. That building was not that beat up at all from looking at it.
And if you think it was damaged by debris from the other towers, why did hundreds of people on the ground not get killed from said falling debris on the ground?
The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building
Look up Institute of Northern Engineering. This is the most recent study that i know of. I think most think the NIST stuff is just silly. As far as sound, who knows what kind of explosives we have quietly developed. I don't know how else you get "the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building". I don't know how they took down these buildings, but I know the BS story the fake news and NIST has been peddling is just that. BS. It ranks up there with the covid hoax.
Dude, believe what you want. I thought this forum was for people who have finally realized what our govt. has been up to for decades. In 2001, and for a few years beyond, I believed, what the MSM was selling. Now, watching those towers fall, and thinking it is just a coincidence they all fell just like a controlled demolition, I have no words. Please, have the last word, but I will not respond any more to something that all can see with their own two eyes.
Even if it didn't have explosives I don't see how that building would be able to fall, let alone, perfectly like that. That building was not that beat up at all from looking at it. And if you think it was damaged by debris from the other towers, why did hundreds of people on the ground not get killed from said falling debris on the ground?