Let me rephrase it:
How is it logical to think WTC7 fell due to damage from WTC1/2, when the supports along barclay street of WTC7 wouldn't have been impacted?
How do you logically get a building falling straight down with supports still in place?
At any rate, the Univertity of Alaska Fairbanks has done some great research on wtc7 and they have indicated the claimed cause (fire) did not cause the collapse. https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Let me rephrase it: How is it logical to think WTC7 fell due to damage from WTC1/2, when the supports along barclay street of WTC7 wouldn't have been impacted?
How do you logically get a building falling straight down with supports still in place?
At any rate, the Univertity of Alaska Fairbanks has done some great research on wtc7 and they have indicated the claimed cause (fire) did not cause the collapse. https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7