I'm willing to admit some of the debris from wtc7 did fall a little bit out of the footprint, as can be seen in the picture (there is debris (a little of it) out of the top part of that picture). But that's not what i asked, is it? i asked: Can't you see its rubble is mostly within its footprint denoted by the yellow line with WTC7 (47 stories)?
Why not answer the questions instead of asking more. I already admitted some did fall out of the footprint, but the real question is why can't you admit its rubble is mostly within its footprint denoted by the yellow line with WTC7 (47 stories)? It's like you're encountering a cognitive dissonance moment. are you?
Picture? the picture you posted: https://external-preview.redd.it/yIS9NvXf6Z9w0ZXrsBwWaWYZ4sJGj-JB_EsI4Wwbtno.jpg?auto=webp&s=d11e5b65769b9968a9b8a62f295df132f5946ff3 Can't you see its rubble is mostly within its footprint denoted by the yellow line with WTC7 (47 stories)?
Metabunk? it's pretty clear in your history https://greatawakening.win/p/15IrBTtPqz/x/c/4Ob8JwOEhjF
I'm willing to admit some of the debris from wtc7 did fall a little bit out of the footprint, as can be seen in the picture (there is debris (a little of it) out of the top part of that picture). But that's not what i asked, is it? i asked: Can't you see its rubble is mostly within its footprint denoted by the yellow line with WTC7 (47 stories)?
Why not answer the questions instead of asking more. I already admitted some did fall out of the footprint, but the real question is why can't you admit its rubble is mostly within its footprint denoted by the yellow line with WTC7 (47 stories)? It's like you're encountering a cognitive dissonance moment. are you?