Ranting on about the audio is weak too, because it's a common red-herring weaker people used years ago. if you really like audio, there's analysts years ago who examined the audio tracks and found noticeable muting in various tracks from msm, you should look for them.
No one gives a shit about the fake stuff. Like you said, lets focus on the truth and what we can prove. So saying only that demolition explosives were not used, nor was there any evidence of explosives found or firing system infrastucture found flies in the face of truth from evidence that we do have, because there's evidence of explosives!
I think you're on the right track that it was planned and allowed to happen. As for who did it, i can't say, i'm in agreement with the A&E 9/11 investigators, that it needs more investigation because the official report is bunk. The leading theory right now is explosives of some form, it's quite difficult to deny in light of all available evidence.
Anyway i'm done, but it might be good to let go of your assumptions, and open up to some new theories.
You were provided source of explosives many times with the a&e 9/11 explosive evidence video, but you don't want to get around to viewing it and assert no source was given for it. why is that?
You're discussing this topic dishonestly, bringing in the personal digs is a terrible angles of discussion, very weak.
Clearly you have a lot more to dig on this topic, especially if 30+ year demolition experts can look at wtc7 and say conclusively it was a demolition. Additionally ignoring many experts in the field stating there is evidence for explosives.
Ranting on about the audio is weak too, because it's a common red-herring weaker people used years ago. if you really like audio, there's analysts years ago who examined the audio tracks and found noticeable muting in various tracks from msm, you should look for them.
No one gives a shit about the fake stuff. Like you said, lets focus on the truth and what we can prove. So saying only that demolition explosives were not used, nor was there any evidence of explosives found or firing system infrastucture found flies in the face of truth from evidence that we do have, because there's evidence of explosives!
I think you're on the right track that it was planned and allowed to happen. As for who did it, i can't say, i'm in agreement with the A&E 9/11 investigators, that it needs more investigation because the official report is bunk. The leading theory right now is explosives of some form, it's quite difficult to deny in light of all available evidence.
Anyway i'm done, but it might be good to let go of your assumptions, and open up to some new theories.
You were provided source of explosives many times with the a&e 9/11 explosive evidence video, but you don't want to get around to viewing it and assert no source was given for it. why is that?