The only problem with this is the video of the collapse as it happened. It can't be more obvious that as each floor was overloaded with debris from above, it pancaked down, blowing dust out on all four sides. Repeating the process all the way down. Cutting the beams with explosives would have caused the building to collapse inward. Watch any controlled demolition to see what I'm talking about.
The video IS the proof! It's simple physics, if the pancake theory were true they couldn't have possibly fell at free fall speed. I believe Newton's second law of motion describes that a force "pancaking" would act on the motion "speed" of the falling floors, to cause at least SOME deceleration, but all the 3 buildings that fell that day were caught, on Video, at Free Fall Acceleration meaning they were ABSOLUTELY demolished.
As to why is wasn't "inward"... because they weren't doing it in vegas! Those guys can do it anyway they want and when it's done to "renovate" an old casino for a new one, the cleanup is easier if it's just one big pile, also being less intrusive or possibly damaging on surrounding buildings.
The moment sustained by the falling floor above is 3 times greater than the weight of the debris. The floor getting hit is designed only to carry it's live load. Add in the accumulation of debris as it goes downward, those bolted connections were shearing off at freefall speed.
An explosive cut steel beam has nowhere to go but inward. To get the effect we saw in the video, they would have had to time the explosives, starting exactly at the crash location, and vaporize the columns out from under the floors above them. Timed to perfection, I might add. Where were the explosive flashes?
I admit I struggled the exact same way, regurgitating all the debunkin's...
If you really care to give it a fair shake... watch the documentary, I probably saw a dozen over the years before I saw this one... This one changed my mind.
Looking back on it...The other docs were clearly propaganda even though they claimed to be "truthers" ... Probably why I kept watching them, they never really satisfied my questions.
The only problem with this is the video of the collapse as it happened. It can't be more obvious that as each floor was overloaded with debris from above, it pancaked down, blowing dust out on all four sides. Repeating the process all the way down. Cutting the beams with explosives would have caused the building to collapse inward. Watch any controlled demolition to see what I'm talking about.
The video IS the proof! It's simple physics, if the pancake theory were true they couldn't have possibly fell at free fall speed. I believe Newton's second law of motion describes that a force "pancaking" would act on the motion "speed" of the falling floors, to cause at least SOME deceleration, but all the 3 buildings that fell that day were caught, on Video, at Free Fall Acceleration meaning they were ABSOLUTELY demolished.
As to why is wasn't "inward"... because they weren't doing it in vegas! Those guys can do it anyway they want and when it's done to "renovate" an old casino for a new one, the cleanup is easier if it's just one big pile, also being less intrusive or possibly damaging on surrounding buildings.
On 9-11, the DS gave zero fucks.
The moment sustained by the falling floor above is 3 times greater than the weight of the debris. The floor getting hit is designed only to carry it's live load. Add in the accumulation of debris as it goes downward, those bolted connections were shearing off at freefall speed.
An explosive cut steel beam has nowhere to go but inward. To get the effect we saw in the video, they would have had to time the explosives, starting exactly at the crash location, and vaporize the columns out from under the floors above them. Timed to perfection, I might add. Where were the explosive flashes?
thermite is not an explosive. Walter White Explains - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am_6X_B0OPE (less than 2 min)
I admit I struggled the exact same way, regurgitating all the debunkin's...
If you really care to give it a fair shake... watch the documentary, I probably saw a dozen over the years before I saw this one... This one changed my mind.
Looking back on it...The other docs were clearly propaganda even though they claimed to be "truthers" ... Probably why I kept watching them, they never really satisfied my questions.