Just wanted to add that although Keeane may appear to be a trustworthy source, I’m questioning more and assuming less based off of the recent spin Revel News put on the Alberta Pastors ‘win’ in court last week or so. Upon reading the ruling it appears that the only issue was the vagueness of the order and if it had been worded differently the judge would have ruled differently. That’s hardly a win the way it was presented, it seems like a technicality.
Anyways I’m just saying I’m a little less inclined to trust anything without vetting even if they’re on our side.
Just wanted to add that although Keeane may appear to be a trustworthy source, I’m questioning more and assuming less based off of the recent spin Revel News put on the Alberta Pastors ‘win’ in court last week or so. Upon reading the ruling it appears that the only issue was the vagueness of the order and if it had been worded differently the judge would have ruled differently. That’s hardly a win the way it was presented, it seems like a technicality. Anyways I’m just saying I’m a little less inclined to trust anything without vetting even if they’re on our side.
Exactly. Think of how dick-hard this entire forum was for Lin Wood? Exact same phrases were used. “I’d trust Lin over anyone”
Then what happened? I’m not saying I haven’t done the same thing in the past. But I’m tired of just tweets being pinned without any proof or evidence.