The @01010001 account is an interesting one. He's not Q, doesn't claim to be Q. But there's a confidence there that makes me wonder if he's someone of significance. I've followed him for quite some time and I'm not sure what to say right now beyond that he's worth a follow. I think there's something of significance there, I just don't know what yet.
It's working as intended. Always, we don't know for sure. Same with the enemy. Spooks like plausible deniability, as usual. We prepare, be vigilant.
In the early days, there was one incident some newer folks may not know about. (IIRC) Trump's POTUS twitter usually have haters as top replies. There was one short period of time when the top reply trumped all the haters. It was a US flag, IIRC. I think it happened only once; I saw that twitter page myself.
He certainly does claim to be Q. 01010001 when converted from binary to ASCII is Q. He literally named himself Q, with a screen name representing the House of Saud (+++).
Why didn't he just use "Q"? Because there already is a Truth Social account called "q" which also posts this kind of content.
I suppose if you want to go with an on the nose translation, sure. But if one actually follows the account, there's no attempt by the author to claim that they are Q. Quite the opposite.
The @01010001 account is an interesting one. He's not Q, doesn't claim to be Q. But there's a confidence there that makes me wonder if he's someone of significance. I've followed him for quite some time and I'm not sure what to say right now beyond that he's worth a follow. I think there's something of significance there, I just don't know what yet.
It's working as intended. Always, we don't know for sure. Same with the enemy. Spooks like plausible deniability, as usual. We prepare, be vigilant.
In the early days, there was one incident some newer folks may not know about. (IIRC) Trump's POTUS twitter usually have haters as top replies. There was one short period of time when the top reply trumped all the haters. It was a US flag, IIRC. I think it happened only once; I saw that twitter page myself.
You're certainly entitled to your opinion.
He certainly does claim to be Q. 01010001 when converted from binary to ASCII is Q. He literally named himself Q, with a screen name representing the House of Saud (+++).
Why didn't he just use "Q"? Because there already is a Truth Social account called "q" which also posts this kind of content.
We've got copycatters. Use discernment.
I suppose if you want to go with an on the nose translation, sure. But if one actually follows the account, there's no attempt by the author to claim that they are Q. Quite the opposite.