1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm the last person on earth you need to convince that the Constitution matters.

But I would posit that it does not to most Leftists.

My argument about us not caring about it in this specific (and ONLY) instance is that I'm very doubtful Kamala will get the nomination. No sense preparing for a battle that we most likely won't need to fight, especially with so many other battles on the horizon.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

Won't matter to the Dems as their voters have no understanding why a natural born citizen is a requirement.

And quite frankly, I'm not sure it should matter to us. Difficult for me to believe that Kamala will indeed be the nominee in November. And that's assuming we actually have an election and I'm far from 100% confident we will.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

Folks, please don't think the "hard part" is coming to an end. The hard part hasn't started yet.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not enough. She needs to be investigated and charged if there is evidence she committed a crime.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree OP, there is something here and I don't think it's something obvious or simple. Rather intriguing.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am concerned about the tone of Bongino's criticism in the past week.

Now, perhaps I've missed an appearance from him where he's been more critical, but I've caught the majority of his TV appearances. So if someone has seen/heard something to the contrary here, let me know.

But all of the criticism I've heard from Bongino, including this tweet, all revolves around the SS lacking competency and collapsing under the weight of DEI-obsessed leadership. And I doubt anyone would disagree that's a major concern.

But the level of incompetence from start to finish last Saturday is so severe, it beggars belief that malice did not play a role. I have yet to hear Bongino "go there".

And that concerns me because the people behind this assassination attempt want NOTHING more than for this whole event to get whitewashed as simple incompetence. And you can just see how that could easily play out. Congressional hearings with Cheatle testifying and getting asked a few tough questions. Lots of great clips for tv and social media. Maybe she eventually gets demoted or even fired. A few reforms occur to make the general public happy, and then the whole thing just goes away.

Fuck that scenario. I want to know who the agent in command was during the rally. I want all communications between that person and Cheatle captured and on public display. And I want to see Bongino calling for those things as well, including calling out the signs of this being a cover up.

Bongino is in a unique situation. He's Ex-SS, he has a lot of goodwill from the patriots of this country. I DON'T want him to say foolish things that can't be supported, but I do want him to call this stuff out instead of constantly playing the "incompetence" card.

And FWIW, James O'Keefe has stated that he's talking to SS whistleblowers as well. How much do you want to bet that what we will hear from those whistleblowers will revolve exclusively around incompetence and DEI initiatives from Cheatle?

It's very easy to have people anonymously blow the whistle to cement a narrative. I hope I'm wrong, but we'll see.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's multiple voices in the drops. One of them is clearly President Trump of course (Q+) and I suspect that's who Q was referring to when they made that statement.

I doubt it's Clancy or JFK Jr., primarily due to them both being dead.

McAfee, even if he is alive (which I won't rule out), would make little sense. He's an anarchist and hedonist. All known data on the man points to him never wanting to be part of a military intelligence operation. He was a man who deeply valued individual liberty, but I never sensed he had any great love of country.

8
JackieDaytona74 8 points ago +8 / -0

We were told what the start of the storm would be.

I would strongly disagree that the storm has arrived.

Q drop #55: Look to Twitter: Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......." God bless.

10
JackieDaytona74 10 points ago +10 / -0

I've looked at some higher res photos of the woman in the crowd and recent photos of Diguiseppi. I'm very skeptical that they're the same woman.

Be careful with this one, guys.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

Project Looking Glass exists exclusively in the realm of rumor. More importantly, it is not the focus of my post.

Though the ability to move forward in time and observe does not necessarily mean that the future/fate is determined, it simply means that time is another dimension not unlike any other dimension.

6
JackieDaytona74 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have always wondered if there was a technological element to "NCSWIC".

Q first told us this years ago, but we've never found out what event or series of events made winning this war a foregone conclusion. Of course, we also do not know exactly what is assuredly coming either. We have always assumed that "NCSWIC" is code for "Nothing can stop the Cabal from being exposed and defeated".

As to what "NCSWIC" really means, that's up for debate, but for this conversation let's assume it's referring to the defeat of the Cabal.

Moving on, I have always wondered what developments occurred for Q to be so sure of victory over an entrenched, shadowy, well-funded and extremely high-tech enemy. I hope someday that story will be told.

So here's a theory that's a bit more banal than the rumored "Project Looking Glass", but still in that same vein that would explain why Q is able to repeatedly claim "NCSWIC":

We have heard Q repeatedly talk about game theory being a key element in their planning against the Cabal and Q has emphasized the importance of anons understanding the principles of game theory.

I have been fortunate enough to have friends & family members with high security clearances. A few have had very high clearances. I can confidently say that quantum computing has been much, much further along at a big building in Utah than the public knows.

Now, quantum computing has a lot of limitations that aren't often discussed in the mainstream. But for certain types of problems, quantum computing is vastly superior to traditional computing if you have the resources and knowledge to build, maintain and program a quantum computer. Most importantly, Quantum computing is excellent when applied to complex systems and in supporting sophisticated AI.

So here's the theory:

Project Looking Glass is a rumored machine gifted to the U.S. government by non-human intelligences that can literally show any location in the past, present and future.

But what if the Q team / Patriots were able to get possession of the next best thing? Specifically, a cutting edge quantum computer that would allow them to implement game theory better than anyone else on the planet?

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll repost what I put in a similar thread. I am always in favor of speaking about the glory of God, and I truly believe He saved the President's life last Friday. But we should also be talking about the failure of men, specifically the men who should have been His instruments in protecting Donald John Trump.

My post from a couple days ago on a similar thread:

I must confess, I have a very, very different reaction to this post than the rest of you. This post serves only to increase my anger.

Like many of you in the comments, I do believe that His hand intervened and prevented DJT's assassination.

But God should never have had to get involved. Donald John Trump is the face of not only a political movement, but as the video correctly asserts, he is the face of a revival.

For nearly 7 years, we have read and discussed the messages from Q. We were slowly convinced of Q's legitimacy. But eventually we knew Q was legitimate and we ate up every drop. We became aware that President Trump was the face of a long-planned counterattack against the Evil that runs the planet we share.

For years and in some cases decades, many of us have understood the broad brush strokes of the evil cabal that has quietly enslaved our world. And in President Trump & Q, we saw the possibility of a golden age for our children. A world without the cabal where this could be a world of truth, liberty and peace.

So to almost lose the face of a war against evil for our planet to such a banal assassination attempt is stomach churning.

This wasn't a high tech attempt on President Trump's life by a desperate cabal. We know that has happened and we have some idea of the myriad, high-tech ways the cabal can remove an enemy.

But this was the clumsiest of attempts. A brainwashed child, a rifle, and a SS and police force that was either utterly incompetent or utterly compromised, take your pick. And we nearly lost our leader to it.

To the Q team: Do better. Justify our faith in you. You are God's instruments. Do the job He has asked you to do. He should not have needed to get involved.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

I must confess NQ, I am stunned by the collective shoulder shrug around here.

"God saved President Trump, cool!".

I sincerely believe He did. But why did he have to?

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you believe I'm missing a point, then please explain how.

God did not put us on this earth to sit back and wait for him to give us what we want. He put us here to be His instruments, to do His work.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not about "hating" Vance.

It's about trying to understand the strategy behind bringing him in as the VP. There's very little publicly available information to justify this choice.

One can only assume that there are less obvious reasons for his selection.

11
JackieDaytona74 11 points ago +11 / -0

I must confess, I have a very, very different reaction to this post than the rest of you. This post serves only to increase my anger.

Like many of you in the comments, I do believe that His hand intervened and prevented DJT's assassination.

But God should never have had to get involved. Donald John Trump is the face of not only a political movement, but as the video correctly asserts, he is the face of a revival.

For nearly 7 years, we have read and discussed the messages from Q. We were slowly convinced of Q's legitimacy. But eventually we knew Q was legitimate and we ate up every drop. We became aware that President Trump was the face of a long-planned counterattack against the Evil that runs the planet we share.

For years and in some cases decades, many of us have understood the broad brush strokes of the evil cabal that has quietly enslaved our world. And in President Trump & Q, we saw the possibility of a golden age for our children. A world without the cabal where this could be a world of truth, liberty and peace.

So to almost lose the face of a war against evil for our planet to such a banal assassination attempt is stomach churning.

This wasn't a high tech attempt on President Trump's life by a desperate cabal. We know that has happened and we have some idea of the myriad, high-tech ways the cabal can remove an enemy.

But this was the clumsiest of attempts. A brainwashed child, a rifle, and a SS and police force that was either utterly incompetent or utterly compromised, take your pick. And we nearly lost our leader to it.

To the Q team: Do better. Justify our faith in you. You are God's instruments. Do the job He has asked you to do. He should not have needed to get involved.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't trust any woman with such a serious case of RBF.

After Friday, she should immediately have been put on administrative leave pending a full investigation into the decision making and (lack of) execution by the SS team on the ground.

But this is clown world and we're expected to patiently wait 70 years for the documents to become declassified.

Well fuck that. This is no different than justice for the C19 hoaxers. We accept nothing less than a full investigation and proper penalties for the guilty.

4
JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think the subject of protecting the VP is a bit more nuanced than what you're laying out, but where I do agree with you is your trust in DJT because I do as well.

I would be far more concerned if this were any other Presidential candidate selecting Vance as their running mate.

However, I trust no one blindly and I would like to better understand the Vance decision. Because on it's face, it's a head-scratcher.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm going to disagree on your initial assertion based on the events from 72 hours ago.

20
JackieDaytona74 20 points ago +20 / -0

I am deeply confused by this pick for myriad reasons.

For better or for worse, Vance has almost no political experience. Part of the value of a strong VP is being able to help navigate quagmires (gigity) in the Senate to get the President's agenda passed.

There's a steady supply of interviews, essays and sound bytes from Vance that are highly critical of DJT. That data will be presented ad nauseum between now and November 5th (if there's an election).

I do not see Vance opening up any new demographics that President Trump couldn't already capture himself.

I can see only two scenarios here:

  1. There's a reason(s) for this pick that's neither obvious nor public.

  2. Vance has a role to play in the interim and is not intended to actually become VP.

4
JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +4 / -0

Copy pasta from the CNN article:

Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.

The FBI said Sunday that the shooter acted alone.

The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.

Audio analysis has also confirmed that the gunman was about 360 to 393 feet from the podium, according to forensics expert Robert Maher.

This conclusion aligns with CNN’s analysis that the gunman was on a rooftop 393 to 492 feet from the podium when shots rang out.

The shots exemplify a “crack-pop” sequence, typical when a supersonic bullet passes a microphone, before the “arrival of the corresponding muzzle blast sound,” Maher, who teaches audio forensics at Montana State University, told CNN.

The time between these markers places the shooter 110 to 120 meters from the microphone, Maher said, assuming the bullet is moving at an average speed of 800 to 1,000 meters per second, the equivalent of 2,600 to 3,280 feet per second.

====================================

Now, there is a possibility that CNN is just creating hype here out of nothing, and that those other two weapons were from SS/PD counter snipers. But it's implied that the other two weapons are not counter-snipers. I'm still working to find the source material.

This may be something, or may be much ado about nothing.

view more: Next ›