4
JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do not work for UHG or Optum, but I have a relationship with them so I need to be careful here.

Some over simplifications but true statements:

Optum (which is on the Fortune 10 list) was a spinoff of UHG literally because legally UHG couldn't make as much money as they were capable of. Consequently, Optum was created and is a powerhouse.

Everything else she mentioned is correct. Well over 100+ subsidiaries and Change Healthcare is indeed one of them and their role is to process claims and prescriptions. Their cyber event earlier this year did indeed have an enormous impact on doctors as well as patients who couldn't get their prescriptions in a timely manner.

The claims denial statements are 100% true.

The only thing I have yet to confirm is that UGH/Optum was indeed buying up healthcare entities that were going out of business due to Change Healthcare being down due to their cyber event/ransomware attack.

But again, everything else that woman shared is 100% accurate.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

With all of the changes in the past few weeks, one would almost think President-Elect Trump is already the president. Hmmm.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems like an incredibly shitty thing to do to a bunch of small town people whose livelihoods depended on those stations.

Just a few weeks notice on shutting them all down?

Very suspicious or a serious dick move at a bare minimum.

12
JackieDaytona74 12 points ago +12 / -0

The families torn apart because mom or dad are too sick (or dead) to provide for the family or raise the kids or both.

Teenagers with their whole life ahead of them dying on the football field or basketball court.

Cancer survivors who went to hell and back to get into remission, suddenly having their cancer return.

Hell isn't hot enough for the people that manufactured and promoted this toxin.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

To say nothing of all the real info out there on subjects "they" don't want you to remember that happened. Was recently trying to do some research on the Oklahoma bombing and tons of info literally has been wiped from the major search engines.

4
JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +4 / -0

I say this just in general, I'd highly encourage everyone to check out Dark Journalist's stuff. Been following Daniel for many, many years and he's a great researcher and I'd argue, a great American.

5
JackieDaytona74 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sort of.

Doesn't prevent that state from enacting other tyrannical laws that could impact your child. And there's no deterrent, they're still getting your tax dollars.

Home schooling ameliorates the problem, but doesn't solve it.

IMHO, the best solution is to remove yourself from the tax base and move to a state that respects parent's rights. That's how the problem gets solved long term.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's a lot of folks in the comments advocating for homeschooling in these scenarios and I agree. I'll also throw out private school which is the route I took when my son was young. Had to take on a part time job to afford it, but was one of the best decisions I ever made.

However, when a state operates in a manner that is this tyrannical, taking your kid out of the public school system doesn't really solve the problem. I'm becoming increasingly confident that the only way to fix states like Vermont and California who view your children as their property is to remove yourself from the tax base.

I'd like to see couples who plan on becoming parents to be more cognizant of the state in which they want to raise their children. Shrinking the tax base for tyranny states and expanding it for freedom states will resolve this issue in the long run.

I know this isn't an option for all. And people should still uses their voices to fight against this kind of insanity. But the reality is that states like California and Vermont are no longer states in which children should be raised, imho.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

The "me" from five years ago would tell the "now me" that he's crazy. But if I were to have a child (unlikely as my wife and I are both 50 and just the thought of a newborn makes me feel tired lol), I would not get any vaccinations for my child.

I'm not fully on board with the "vaccines can never be good" bandwagon as the basic science behind exposing someone to attenuated virus still seems sound to me.

But the quality of those vaccines is so poor (contaminants, made in China, etc) and the lack of transparency in regards to the data on how a young child responds to their immune system being provoked at such a young age, I strongly lean towards no vaccines right now.

Again, I'm not on board with the people that are black and white "all vaccines are poison" as the human body is rarely black and white.

But for what it's worth from a guy you've never met, I cautiously think you're making the best decision for your child.

And CONGRATULATIONS on your first kid! It's the greatest, most rewarding, gray-hair inducing, wonderful, stomach churning, amazing adventure that is humanly possible.

I wish and pray for the best for you, your wife and your new baby, AAPA.

I'm going to go give my son a hug.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

If (and it's a BIG if) Wray is to be trusted, his behavior during his tenure could be easily explained. He's simply there to behave like an agent of the Cabal while gathering intel on the entire operation. That operation is then handed to the demolitions expert (Patel) so that the building can be brought down as efficiently as possible.

But again, it's a big "if" and I won't pretend to know who/what Wray actually is.

That being said, it is a certainty that very good people have been in place for years and often decades and doing very bad things while they're there to maintain their cover for the right time.

The term we used back in the day was "sin eater". It takes a special human being to be a sin eater and not be damaged in the process. I hope Wray is one of those people.

5
JackieDaytona74 5 points ago +5 / -0

No idea what they are but they're invading D.C. airspace which should be very concerning to believers and skeptics alike.

4
JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +5 / -1

I hope I'm wrong, but if a "medical professional" were to inject me, my wife, or my son with a vaccine (Especially the Jab), I suspect I would be in "an eye for an eye" mode and that person dispensing the shot is at the very least going to have their life destroyed or perhaps ended.

I don't view that any differently than walking into my home and pointing a gun at me or my loved ones.

8
JackieDaytona74 8 points ago +8 / -0

My wife still thanks me once a week for stopping her from getting the Jab.

She lost her job because of it but she's very happy with the choice.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm rather skeptical of this theory.

We're well past the point of knowing who is compromised and who is not in Congress.

It's certainly possible that there's an element of gamesmanship with the Gaetz nomination, but it's not what's described here. I strongly suspect President Trump did indeed want Gaetz in as AG and they were either foiled by the uniparty or something happened behind the scenes.

Gaetz has long been a target of the deep state and has had multiple dirty tricks and honey pots thrown at him over the years. It's possible "they" had something on him that wasn't horrific, but substantive enough to make his confirmation difficult to impossible.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is not a real tweet. It's a parody account.

view more: Next ›