34
JackieDaytona74 34 points ago +34 / -0

Let's also not forget that Senator Ron Johnson was a member of a TINY group of elected officials who was pushing back against the Jab and big pharma in the very early days when it was completely unfashionable to do so.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

Folks, be really careful with the Telit chip portion of this post.

The numbers presented by the account are all accurate. But I can find zero corroboration or evidence on the presence of Telit chips in voting machines.

The fastest way to lose an argument is to overstate one's case.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very interesting data.

One of the problems I have is that I can't get a doctor or find data that conclusively links high cholesterol to vascular problems. There are myriad examples of people with high cholesterol but clear, open arteries, and just as many examples of the opposite.

And the second your cholesterol gets "too high", that doctor can't grab the prescription pad fast enough to put you on a statin. Yet another class of drug with highly fuzzy outcomes. Yeah it lowers your cholesterol readings, but the life expectancy data is incredibly underwhelming.

I think the key here has already been called out by several people in the thread already: Eat natural stuff. Don't be afraid of fat. DO be afraid of heavily refined foods.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

But it's not. Normies aren't learning this. There's no object lesson. We're sending more money/munitions to Ukraine.

4
JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +4 / -0

Of course it's evil. The regime was installed by Barack Obama, the U.S. State Department and Victoria Nuland.

Why the President doesn't call attention to the fact that the Ukraine government exists as the result of a U.S.-led color revolution is beyond me.

10
JackieDaytona74 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's so depressing to see shit like this.

Equal parts stupid, mentally ill and self righteous.

There's no person more dangerous than an imbecile who thinks they're brilliant. Empires fall because of these people.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where is the data?

Why is this being posted with zero data or corroboration?

You just wasted the time of several patriots.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based on his behavior of late, I'd argue that what Tucker really wants is a new brain.

14
JackieDaytona74 14 points ago +14 / -0

Greer is an enigma. He's clearly been very plugged into this subject for a very long time.

He's also utterly and completely full of shit with his assertion that all aliens are wonderful and all of the abductions are being carried out by intel agencies.

I would posit that the man should be listened to (not necessarily believed on anything) due to his access, but that he should not be looked to for guidance on this subject in any way, shape or form. I view him as a completely compromised individual, either by the intel community or the NIH's themselves.

He's an abject narcissist and at best a lunatic, at worst a media agent for some very bad entities. I'm strongly in favor of the latter.

12
JackieDaytona74 12 points ago +12 / -0

The question remains: Why on earth did the President nominate her?

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most of this is old hat, but this part is important:

"DEWs that can not just induce, but control your emotions, behaviors, project sounds, "voices," thoughts, both sending and receiving"

The "voices" piece is also old hat for most of us, it's the emotional and behavioral control that's important here.

The word to remember here is "entrainment", because that's the word that the people who have these technologies use for them.

These technologies are very refined and have been around for a very long time. I know this because I am 100% certain one was used on me in the late 90's.

In Washington D.C. at any given time, there's usually some high profile government worker or ex-government worker giving a talk in the evening for an invite only crowd. To be clear, these aren't super secret talks, but they usually are invite only. Typically the speaker will spend an hour or so giving a prepared talk on some foreign or domestic policy that they're particularly invested in.

My mentor was a deputy director of a large federal department and she invited me to a talk with an ex-pentagon big wig. Suffice it to say, this person had a very, very different perspective on foreign policy than my mentor and I did.

The talk he gave was unusually rousing and strongly imploring the crowd to support the idea of future military adventures in the Middle East. The speech ended with a rhetorical crescendo and the entire crowd rose to its feet clapping..... Including my mentor and myself.

After a few seconds we looked at one another in horror. WTF were we doing??

She was eventually able through her connections to almost conclusively determine that an entrainment technology was used during that talk. When one thinks about what followed a couple years later with the George W. Bush administration, my anecdote becomes even more evil.

I can only imagine the sophistication level of these technologies now.

On a positive note, perhaps these technologies could be used to convince white American Leftists to immigrate to South Africa.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

The SAVE act passes, Republicans win bigly and DJT has the mandate he needs/deserves. Even the RINOs will be forced to support his agenda.

But no SAVE act, it's a roll of the dice based on how much agency the Cabal has left.

10
JackieDaytona74 10 points ago +10 / -0

Given what the President is trying to do in the Middle East and the broader goals of what he's trying to accomplish, I think you're giving Rand Paul far too much of a pass.

I was an enormous fan of his father. But Rand Paul KNOWS what is at stake with Iran. I would argue that his stance is nothing less than sedition.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is an AI video.

And I must confess, I don't want kids pulled into politics of any sort. Let children be children.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

"All your comments, prayers and support lift me up, bring me back closer to God and his promises. Step by step. I have to throw myself totally into the arms and protection of God Almighty and his son Jesus Christ."

And your friends here too!

I can't imagine how difficult this has been made by him just literally disappearing. It's really difficult for me to not judge him VERY harshly. Bad enough to leave you at such a crucial time, so much worse to disappear without any explanation.

I have had a few things happen in my life where I honestly don't know how I got through them. Now when anything really tough comes along, I'll literally say out loud "rearview mirror", because I learned that no matter how bad things get, a day WILL arrive that it's all in the rear view mirror, and I'll be wondering again how I got through it to the point of life being good again.

For whatever reason, saying those two words seems to really help me when times get tough.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've got your back, EE. Keep talking to us. Keep drawing strength from us. Never be afraid to vent or ask for help and prayers.

6
JackieDaytona74 6 points ago +6 / -0

I prayed for you and will continue to pray for you, EE.

Life can throw a lot at us sometimes. Sometimes it's positively crushing.

I suspect your boyfriend stopped speaking to you not out of lack of care & affection for you, but simply weakness of character and being unable to have the strength to help you go through this fight. It obviously doesn't speak well to his character, but better weakness than lack of love.

You are a self-contained unit. You have the strength to fight this battle on your own if need be. Resolve to win this fight on your own with God's help. Sometimes our worst moments can be instructive when we can get past the pain.

Perhaps this challenge was God's way of showing you that your boyfriend is not the right partner for you.

Regardless, what matters now is that you stay strong and that you WIN THIS BATTLE.

Fight. Pray. Draw strength from the people here on GAW because we DO care about you and your well-being.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

Flynn's comments on the Iran engagement were the final straw for me in terms of viewing him as anything resembling an ally to the President.

He KNOWS what the stakes are in Iran. He KNOWS why DJT is using force to bring Iran into line with the rest of the Middle East.

And yet he spews this garbage in the full text of this post:

"American military might must evolve rapidly. We wasted these past few months losing critical time to another Middle East rival.

Instead of screwing around overseas in unnecessary wars, we should be laser focused on taking many lessons learned and incorporating them into innovative ideas, new weapons platforms, and the future of warfare."

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not fond of the messenger here (Najadi) for myriad reasons, but I have zero reasons to not trust Solomon and a boatload of ones to trust him.

This could be a very significant development given Solomon being targeted early by the white hats to dispense key pieces of information to the public.

Or it might be a bit of a nothing burger. But it's difficult to believe that this isn't important given that Solomon is stepping away from what I assume is a very demanding life for four months to assist in this project.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think currently it's pretty apparent right now, but we also must be diligent to new threats.

The rule of thumb in protecting our DNA comes down to two categories (IMHO):

  1. Protecting your DNA health.
  2. Protecting your DNA privacy.

MRNA "vaccines" are a direct assault on our DNA. The mechanics of these "vaccines" are so sloppy and so poorly understood for one thing. But as we have learned from the small bit of good science out there on these MRNA "vaccines" is that they result in permanent changes to the body and potentially permanent changes to our DNA (as opposed to the promised temporary changes to our RNA).

There are toxins in our food and environment that can damage our DNA, including shortening our telomeres, and consequently our lives. Eating good, unrefined food from sources that are as clean as possible.

Protecting our DNA also extends to privacy. Do not use the common ancestral companies offering to sequence your DNA as that data is not kept private, but rather sold to the highest bidder. Imagine what the Cabal could do with a complete DNA catalog of the world's population? Targeted pathogens. Want to take out every single guy with alpha male genes? Easy peasy when you've got a genetic map of every guy on the planet.

New technologies and privacy invasions will no doubt come along and we must be vigilant in spotting them and protecting both our health and our privacy.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate and respect Clandestine, but this is an incredibly myopic perspective on his/her part.

DJT would never have gone to this level of kinetic action simply to expose Barry and Hillary. DJT's plan is far grander and long-term than simply exposing two Cabal toadies that will be footnotes in history.

This is about knocking down the final obstacle to peace in the middle east, this is about aligning the Middle East with the United States with economic/industrialization agreements based on the one concept that transcends all cultures: Shared economic interest.

And a middle east that is focused on industrialization where the citizens have money in their pockets and food on the table is a wonderful check against an oft out of control Israeli government, to say nothing of neutering the extremist islamic elements.

Again, I respect and appreciate Clandestine, but this is terribly pedestrian thinking on their part.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too. Pretty amazing that she very well might go down as the greatest DNI head we've ever had in the somewhat short history of that intel organization.

Very sad that we're losing her, but I understand it. Still not sure on the nominee (Clayton), as I'm in the middle of my due diligence on him. But seems like an odd pick given his background.

3
JackieDaytona74 3 points ago +3 / -0

We're witnessing the most deft, pro American worker foreign policy by a President in our lifetime.

view more: Next ›