Its obvious AF from the Judge's own social media that she perceives Jones as a political enemy and can be argued that she would unfairly rule.
The issue with Alex's phone records being given to prosecutors "mistakenly" sounds like a load of shit and will expose illegal actions by prosecutors (as has been seen several times over the last couple years - Rittenhouse?)
Appeals guaranteed.
This is another way to wake people up to the all-encompassing corruption. Sure, a few retards are foaming at the mouth like rabid dogs over the obviously gross persecution, but the whole trial is a farce show being run by clowns against a man who wields the truth.
The conclusion of this farce will not follow their script, I think.
The jury is still out on AJ IMO. I've seen all the arguments, pro and con. My father is a retired senior exec from a major network. Approx. 20 years ago, we got into a dispute over politics and I used a link from Infowars. Mind you, I had not even heard of IW and AJ at that point. My father immediately countered with a debunk of AJ. Understand my father is a full square and aloof to such topics - he's a full blown libtard. The only way, in hindsight, I can figure that my father knew who AJ was from internal memorandums within the network, highlighting the threat. If that is the case, the left MSM had already identified him as an enemy 20 years ago, putting him on our side. I could be wrong, but I still think AJ might be on our side, given the way he is treated by the left. Then again, I think he and Corsi also look like they could related. My .02.
Just because AJ started out on our side doesn't mean that he wasn't eventually compromised by Mossad. He might still say mostly everything we want to hear, and that he wants to say, but he never touches the JQ.
And when Q came out, AJ lied about Q in a way that was obvious to everyone. Saying he was talking to Q and that he knows who Q is etc.