The message of Q is to do your own research, yet there is an abundance of Biblefags that get butthurt at the mention of doing research on the origins of Abrahamic religion and the Bible. Wat do?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
SO what you're saying is that you're one of the butthurt ones?
Got it!
What I'm saying is you will get eviscerated due to lack of knowledge.
Well your knowledge is no better than mine - you just "believe" the knowledge that you represent. That's part of the problem. That is leftist thinking. Lots of Biblefags telling people what "the truth" is instead of preceding statements with "I believe that..."
On the contrary, I know much about the history of the different Bible versions because I've studied this subject extensively. It's the reason I'm no longer an agnostic, in fact.
From my experience, it's the people who make claims such as "KJV is so diluted I wouldn't exactly call it a source" who are the ones telling people what "the truth" is in spite of the fact they are poorly educated on the subject and can't even tell me what the Codex Vaticanus is without Googling it. And, of course, they use Google.
So when it comes down to it, when you make claims the KJV is diluted, you better bring some sauce.
And if you have a theory about something based on research, share it. It sounds like you're scared of Bible believers punching holes in your theory, though.
Wrong thread. I am not afraid of Bible believers doing anything. I am pointing out the logic of "research everything" vs. "don't research anything." You should have brought the KJV up on the other thread. You seem confused.