Ladies and Gentlemen,

From time to time, I have noticed various items of speculation, criticism, skepticism and endorsement of and surrounding Phil Godlewski. With it being said at the outset that I do not know and have never met or conversed with Mr. Godlewski, today I add my voice to the cacophony.

Does Mr. Godlewski have a “source” as he claims? Almost undoubtedly.

That, of course, is not the end of the matter, as it leaves open other questions. Is the source using Mr. Godlewski as a voice to spread information or disinformation? If the source is using Mr. Godlewski as a voice to spread disinformation, is Mr. Godlewski aware? If the voice is using Mr. Godlewski to spread true information, does that mean on all occasions Mr. Godlewski is functioning as a voice for his source? Would that mean everything Mr. Godlewski says will come to pass, given sufficient time? And so on. So a lot of questions remain open, despite my opening statement.

Let’s revisit my opening claim. Mr. Godlewski has a source. Why do I believe that? My belief is not anchored in his ability or inability to accurately predict future prevents. (“If no one knows what will happen, who can tell him when it will happen?” Ecclesiastes 8:7.) Rather, it is a conclusion pointed to from certain independent data sets.

As an initial matter, on several occasions Mr. Godlewski has produced video presentations with informational content, organization, clarity and documentary support that would not reasonably be possible if he had no source. I will not be exhaustive. Here are two examples:

https://rumble.com/vkzbqb-symposium-nightcap-day-1-august-10th-2021.html

This video was initially livestreamed just minutes after the close of the opening night of Mr. Lindell’s Cyber Symposium. In this video, Mr. Godlewski: (1) introduces Jena Griswold and Tina Peters to his audience; (2) explains the backdrop leading to Ms. Peters’ actions; (3) outlines the reaction of Ms. Griswold; (4) further outlines Ms. Peters’ counterreaction; (5) delves into the sources of funding and support of Ms. Griswold. All within minutes of the close of the Symposium. His presentation is linear, coherent, supported with visuals and so on. And he announced his livestream on the spur of the moment because the portion of the Symposium that raised these topics was, frankly, frantic and incomprehensible. No one could have possibly watched the Symposium and understood anything about the Griswold/Peters conflict, other than that such a conflict existed. But Mr. Godlewski knew all about it. How? Because he had a source other than the Symposium.

Then there’s this video:

https://rumble.com/v145dhp-prism-may-9th-2022.html

This video pertains to 2000 Mules. The sequence of events was: (1) 2000 Mules became available online on May 7, 2022; (2) Mr. Godlewski viewed 2000 Mules on May 8; and (3) Mr. Godlewski livestreamed this video the next day on May 9. So he had one day to prepare this video.

In this video, Mr. Godlewski: (1) identified the user interfaces from 2000 Mules as belonging to Prism; (2) explained the structure of each user interface, including its overall organization and data elements therein; (3) explained the informational manipulation made possible via these user interfaces; (4) identified a particular red folder that was visually prominent on the set of 2000 Mules in certain scenes; (5) explained its relevance as containing certain documents relating to continuity of government; (6) presented his audience with visual clips of President Trump holding what appeared to be the same folder in the days proximal to January 6, 2021. Even if all of his claims are false, you must consider that he would have to be a fantasist of the highest order and an unparalleled workaholic to construct those fictions, tie them to the scenes of the film, further tie them to historical news footage, organize a video presentation, and be prepared to be linear and coherent in conducting his video all in the span of 24 hours – with no help. Either that, or Mr. Godlewski received considerable assistance from his source, and that’s how he pulled it off.

The point to be taken from these two previous examples is that there have been several occasions on which Mr. Godlewski has produced video presentation expounding upon recent events wherein the timeline simply did not allow for Mr. Godlewski to do what he had done if he were working alone. He couldn’t have performed the research, organized his thoughts, located video clips, photos and documents to support his presentation, structured a video, and minimally rehearsed at least key portions, in order to come across in a clear, polished, smooth manner. And this has happened many times – not just these two.

Let’s move on to a different variety of evidence supporting my belief. On one particular occasion, it appears to me that Mr. Godlewski briefly slipped up and spoke directly to his source (or a “handler” representing his source) during a livestream. View this video, starting at 34:00 and watch for 15 seconds.

https://rumble.com/vm3rsd-the-negotiation-period-september-4th-2021.html

You will see that during his livestream, Mr. Godlewski’s phone buzzes. He picks it up, appears to read a text message, and in a moment of spontaneous candor says, as if to apologize to whomever had sent the message, “I didn’t mean to do that… Umm… I guess it’s just already starting to come natural.” What do I make of that? It appears that Mr. Godlewski has someone reviewing his presentations – live – and ensuring he stays “inside the lines.” That indicates a source. So much so, that I’m actually somewhat surprised this video has remained online in unedited form.

Then there’s the infamous “whiteboard.” Here:

https://twitter.com/patriottakes/status/1412561302896078850

Mr. Godlewski’s name is written on the board. The same board that General Flynn and Mr. Lindell have commandeered as a backdrop for their photo-op. So his name is on the board. So what? What does that mean? I can’t exactly tell you. But I can say this: Mr. Godlewski didn’t sneak into the room and write his name on the board, himself. My name isn’t on that board. Is yours? Like it or not, his name is on that board. And it means something, even if we don’t precisely know what it means. That board was produced to help a group of people figure out how to accomplish something, and Mr. Godlewski appears to play some role in that. Or else his name wouldn’t be on that board.

This is getting long. And while there’s more I could say, I’ll conclude with these thoughts. Mr. Godlewski has a source. He’s not simply unmitigated LARP. That said, I reserve judgment with regard to whether his source is using Mr. Godlewski to spread information or disinformation or some combination of the two. I also reserve judgment on the topic of whether Mr. Godlewski, himself, is at all times “in the loop” on this matter. I can say with 100% certainty that not all matters voiced by Mr. Godlewski come from his source – so, at the very least, you have to discern whether you are listening to content that originates from Mr. Godlewski, from his source, or from some other provenance.

Ever yours, simon_says