AM I WRONG FOR FEELING A LITTLE UNEASY WITH THIS NEW SPACE FORCE LOGO?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (252)
sorted by:
Where in the Bible does it say Mary is the Morning Star?
It doesn't, in fact.
Revelation 22:16
I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
Here's what Jesus said about those who worship His mother-
Luke 8:19-21
19 Then came to him his mother and his brethren, and could not come at him for the press.
20 And it was told him by certain which said, Thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to see thee.
21 And he answered and said unto them, My mother and my brethren are these which hear the word of God, and do it.
Luke 11:27-28
27 And it came to pass, as he spake these things, a certain woman of the company lifted up her voice, and said unto him, Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps which thou hast sucked.
28 But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.
This 8 pointed star represents the Babylonian fertility goddess Inanna. In Egypt, she was known as Isis, in Assyria as Ishtar, and identified in the Hebrew bible as Ashtoreth.
https://biblehub.com/topical/a/ashtoreth.htm
The Roman Catholic Church has two doctrines, one for the profane, and the other for the insider elites.
Some of the priests and bishops are uninitiated in the secret doctrines.
The others are well aware and celebrate black masses and rape your children. They know the mitre (the bishop hat) represents the fish god Dagon. They know the Virgin Mary represents Inanna/Isis/Ishtar. They know that's why Las Vegas has this 8 pointed star on its welcome sign. They think you are stupid.
The bible also clearly refers to the devil as the morning star.
Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.”
It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan.
Satan, is not Lucifer.
Lucifer is the morning star. Satan is something totally different. Totally different Energy signature. totally different presence dude. Not even close to the same thing.Maybe if you look at it with the blanket abrahamic religions definition MAYBE.... But still no way. Nor are they "demons/Daemons" These things feel primordial.
And for those whom might not be aware.....Lucifers energetic aura and resonation feels an awful lot like the Arch Angel Michael.
Not trying to downplay your aura detection skills but I was purely talking in the objective context of biblical interpretation. Most scholars and textual critics would agree that Lucifer and the devil are one in the same in the context of the bible and not arch Angel Michael. My point was mainly to contrast the original post made by ThePowerOfPrayer.
In reality no one can deny you subjective personal feelings or experience on the subject. You could be totally correct.
It would take to long to explain to you here where the origin of the name came from, but Jesus breathed on the apostles and gave them the Holy Spirit, this is the origin of the Church, and the Holy Spirit has guided the Church for 2000 years. While you have your Bible out, can you explain to me who removed the 7 books from your King James version of the Bible, and under what authority they did so? After you figure that out we can go into a deeper discussion about the Blessed Mother.
I was born and raised Roman Catholic. I also attended Catholic school and was both an altar boy and a Columbian Squire.
As far as it supposedly taking too long to explain why Mary is referred to as the Morning Star AKA Stella Matutina by the Roman Catholics, here's the profane version-
Mary, Morning Star
The Blessed Virgin Mary is perhaps the most simple to understand, visually. It should also be familiar phraseology for Catholics. Catholic tradition refers to Mary as the morning star because, like the star that rises early in the morning to reveal the day (Venus), as the Mother of God, “Mary appeared on the horizon of salvation history before Christ,” as Pope St. John Paul II puts it in Redemptoris Mater.
Source is the National Catholic Register - https://www.ncregister.com/blog/who-is-the-morning-star-in-the-bible-mary-jesus-or-lucifer
Which goddess is also associated with the planet Venus?
Ishtar!
Ishtar’s primary legacy from the Sumerian tradition is the role of fertility figure; she evolved, however, into a more complex character, surrounded in myth by death and disaster, a goddess of contradictory connotations and forces—fire and fire-quenching, rejoicing and tears, fair play and enmity. The Akkadian Ishtar is also, to a greater extent, an astral deity, associated with the planet Venus.
With Shamash, the sun god, and Sin, the moon god, she forms a secondary astral triad. In this manifestation her symbol is a star with 6, 8, or 16 rays within a circle. As goddess of Venus, delighting in bodily love, Ishtar was the protectress of prostitutes and the patroness of the alehouse. Part of her cult worship probably included temple prostitution. Her popularity was universal in the ancient Middle East, and in many centres of worship she probably subsumed numerous local goddesses. In later myth she was known as Queen of the Universe, taking on the powers of An, Enlil, and Enki.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ishtar-Mesopotamian-goddess
Archived link - https://archive.ph/myoXR
That's interesting. Mary is also known as Queen of the Universe and even has basilicas named that in her honor...
https://maryqueenoftheuniverse.org/
Also, it states Ishtar was related to both Sun and Moon worship in the Encyclopedia Brittanica article.
I wonder why this statue of Mary found in a Roman Catholic Church depicts her sitting on the moon?
https://files.catbox.moe/icb897.jpg
As far as the Apocrypha which you state were removed from the King James version, you apparently fail to realize those 7 books were included in the 1611 Authorised Version and there are actually 15 books.
Here's a screenshot of the Book of Ecclesiasticus as it appeared in the 1611 KJV, in fact-
https://files.catbox.moe/vj9kb2.jpg
Who removed the Apocrypha from later versions of the King James? They weren't removed until 1885 A.D.
From the 1828 Webster's Dictionary-
APOC'RYPHA, noun [Gr. from, to conceal.]
Literally such things as are not published; but in an appropriate sense, books whose authors are not known; whose authenticity, as inspired writings, is not admitted, and which are therefore not considered a part of the sacred canon of the scripture. When the Jews published their sacred books, they called them canonical and divine; such as they did not publish, were called apocryphal. The apocryphal books are received by the Romish Church as canonical, but not by Protestants.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Apocrypha
The 15 books of the Apocrypha are only found in the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament. The Apocrypha were Jewish history books and were not considered to be divinely inspired even in the time of Jesus.
As far as your claims the Holy Spirit has guided the Roman Catholic Church for 2000 years-
Did the Holy Spirit guide Roman Catholics to exterminate Anabaptists simply because they believed the Bible taught the doctrine of water baptism by immersion instead of sprinkling?
Did the Holy Spirit guide Roman Catholics to attempt to assassinate King James and the entire British Parliament with explosives because King James dared to publish the Bible in English and distribute it to the profane?
Did the Holy Spirit guide Roman Catholic priests and bishops to castrate altar boys so they wouldn't lose their youthful voices and features as they got older?
Did the Holy Spirit guide Roman Catholic leadership to cover up the existence of pedophile priests and shield them from secular authorities, and to move them around the country and the world to avoid prosecution?
Martin Luther remove the seven books. for there to be 15, the Catholic church would have had to remove eight, they did not. The books that were removed by Martin Luther coincidentally were the same books removed by the Jews in 90 AD as they were leading too many people to Christianity because they were prophetic in relation to Jesus. Martin Luther had no authority under the church. Jesus gave that to his disciples. His disciples, later, the Catholic Church, have been guided by the holy Spirit for 2,000 years. The dogma of the church is very specific. Can never be changed because it cannot be wrong because God cannot be wrong because it is completely inspired by the holy Spirit. This is why Pope Francis cannot make changes to the dogma. He can only put encyclical letters out that are not binding in any way for members of the church to follow. There is a whole process for adding dogma and it takes at times hundreds of years for Cardinals to reach a consensus. If you look at your current King James Bible it follows what Martin Luther did do the good book. You currently have the Catholic Bible minus the seven books that Martin Luther threw out as did the Jews.
There's a lot to unpack here and much of it is wrong.
Martin Luther has absolutely nothing to do with the King James Version, for starters. Luther translated the Latin Vulgate into German because he did not know Greek or Hebrew.
Secondly, the King James Version contained all 15 books of the Apocrypha in 1611.
Thirdly, the Roman Catholic Church claims it is descended from the apostles and that Peter was the first Pope.
The insider elites even claim to the profane the Pope sits on a throne marked by an upside down cross because Peter was crucified upside down.
https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/st-peter-prince-of-the-apostles-5142
Rather than answer my four questions about the Holy Spirit working through the Roman Catholic Church, you instead ranted about Pope Francis being unable to make changes to the dogma and attributed that to the Holy Spirit protecting the Roman Catholic Church from error.
Are you claiming Pope Francis is unable to speak ex cathedra and set any dogma he so desires? And if he did so, would you remain a Roman Catholic? In fact, you're a heretic according to the Council of Trent if you dare to question Pope Francis's authority.
What about the Pope's endorsement of the mRNA vaccines? Shouldn't that be enough to question what the hell is going on?
Maybe your position is that Francis is an antipope, which means you're a sedevacantist? If so, I congratulate you in taking the first step out of Babylon.
Why did the Roman Catholic Church remove the Book of Enoch? That's the question you should be asking.
I think you're stupid
My hunch is you're a Catholic who would rather sling insults than examine the facts.
Cognitive dissonance is indeed a mother fucker.
Says the man slinging insults