Since it's been brought up...Remember when the beef industry sued Oprah bc she said she quit eating beef and they claimed her saying that caused them to lose sales or whatever? Should people be able to sue all the "elite" for using their influence to get people to trust and take the jab? Personally I see both sides. They shouldn't be able to sue bc they are grown and should have done their own research...on the flip side their research results were censored and they would have came to the same conclusion anyways unless they were like anons and knew to dive deeper but if they were anons they wouldn't be in the situation they're in so...where does it end? I hope the whole house of cards falls in 🍿😎
Edit: changed meat to beef 😂
I see your reasoning but what about those coerced? No job no jab? Shouldn’t employers be on the hook if they made job employment contingent on taking the jab?
Since it's been brought up...Remember when the beef industry sued Oprah bc she said she quit eating beef and they claimed her saying that caused them to lose sales or whatever? Should people be able to sue all the "elite" for using their influence to get people to trust and take the jab? Personally I see both sides. They shouldn't be able to sue bc they are grown and should have done their own research...on the flip side their research results were censored and they would have came to the same conclusion anyways unless they were like anons and knew to dive deeper but if they were anons they wouldn't be in the situation they're in so...where does it end? I hope the whole house of cards falls in 🍿😎 Edit: changed meat to beef 😂
...wee bit of difference between ranchers and big pharma...
...but you stated your case and I appreciate your reply....
Oh for sure!
I see your reasoning but what about those coerced? No job no jab? Shouldn’t employers be on the hook if they made job employment contingent on taking the jab?