An Australian woman who transitioned to male, before realizing it was a mistake, is suing a psychiatrist after he approved her female-to-male hormone treatment following a single meeting — and later signed off on two surgeries to remove her breasts and uterus. - The Great Awakening

An Australian woman who transitioned to male, before realizing it was a mistake, is suing a psychiatrist after he approved her female-to-male hormone treatment following a single meeting — and later signed off on two surgeries to remove her breasts and uterus. (nypost.com)

posted 2 years ago by penisse 2 years ago by penisse +44 / -0

12 comments

12 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (12)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– FreedomPatriot 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

What is that old saying... "Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it". She wanted it, sought out a doctor to get it approved, made the surgery appointments, went to pre-op meetings, and proceeded with surgeries.... so, yea, she got what she wanted. She had PLENTY of time to think things through... NO ONE took advantage of her.... she sought out doctors who would do what she wanted. We all have to live with the consequences of our own actions. Maybe she could be an advocate to others who need to hear that the decisions to mutilate one's body is a permanent one.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– motrhed3 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

the doctors are responsible as well. they should not be doctors. she should not get much, but they should not bedoctors.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q