I compiled the following links based on some internet searches, what conclusion do you draw? I am going to look more into this, and I am curious who funds the studies and research required for this technology. I think I know the answer, but I'm going to take a gander and see what is out there.
Notice the players involved... bill gates, WEF, schwab, etc
PubMed: "An intra-body molecular communication networks framework for continuous health monitoring and diagnosis" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26737190/
RAND (CA nonprofit, but military roots?): "Internet of Bodies: Our Connected Future" https://www.rand.org/about/nextgen/art-plus-data/giorgia-lupi/internet-of-bodies-our-connected-future.html
RAND (CA nonprofit, but military roots?): "The Internet of Bodies Will Change Everything, for Better or Worse" https://www.rand.org/blog/articles/2020/10/the-internet-of-bodies-will-change-everything-for-better-or-worse.html
World Economic Forum (WEF): "Tracking how our bodies work could change our lives ... Internet of Bodies" https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/internet-of-bodies-covid19-recovery-governance-health-data/
World Economic Forum (WEF): "Internet of Bodies Briefing" https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IoB_briefing_paper_2020.pdf
Patent WO/2020/060606 (Applicant: Microsoft): "CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA" https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606
Patent US20200097951 (Applicant: Microsoft): "CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA" https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US291464337
World Economic Forum (WEF): "The Fourth Industrial Revolution, by Klaus Schwab" https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab
Forbes (loves transhumanism, they've been writing about it for over a decade now): "Transhumanism And The Future Of Humanity: 7 Ways The World Will Change By 2030" https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarwantsingh/2017/11/20/transhumanism-and-the-future-of-humanity-seven-ways-the-world-will-change-by-2030/
"It's Official, The Transhuman Era Has Begun" https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnnosta/2018/08/22/its-official-the-transhuman-era-has-begun/
"Immortality Or Bust: Transhumanism In The White House" https://www.forbes.com/sites/traceyfollows/2020/06/25/immortality-or-bust-transhumanism-in-the-whitehouse/
I only researched and read for a little while on this, but I think we should be looking. Apparently everybody just puts their plans in plain sight, I don't get why.
Alex Jones... aka Controlled Opposition... You're too busy going down dead-end rabbit holes to actually do anything productive. Mission Accomplished.
“You will own nothing and be happy”
Is an example of an obviously valid rabbit hole that is out in the open
Can you give me some examples of obviously invalid rabbit holes?
I agree, they do "broadcast"... but by mixing in UFO's, Chemtrails and other obvious misinformation they make it easy for people to fall for the bandwagon fallacy. Their goal is to confuse and divide, and you end up driving away people because they think we're flat earthers....
I mean half the links you provided are from forbes and the WEF!
I'm all for it discussing the science of it, but it has to be "good" science... (verifiable repeatable falsifiable) otherwise it's just propaganda.
I'd love it if we could agree on a list of topics...
that fit into ^this^ category. Then we can deport those offending posts that are detracting from the ones we actually come here for... Otherwise we are giving credence to the MSM narrative that we are just crazy "conspiracy theorists".
Remember this is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site.
I did not specify “invalid” rabbit holes, only that certain rabbit holes after having been fleshed out were demonstrably valid after-the-fact, eg. the WEF executing on exactly the things they have broadcasted in the open and told us they would do.
The invalid ones, though, are the ones that are demonstrably bottomless or have been demonstrably proven invalid after the fact.
When did I ever say anything about chemtrails or UFOs exactly? You are the one bandwagging by erroneously sticking me on a bandwagon. Talk about bad faith chatting...
And you’re right, this is not a fringe conspiracy site, and we in part pay attention to bill gates, the WEF, and all of their friends, thanks to Q. https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/9239841.html#9239924
I’m not on a keyboard so I can’t check right now, but you seem new here. Don’t worry fren, you’ll either learn to research or learn to shill better with time. Hopefully the former.
I'm wondering then why you asked
I'm calling it bunk and lumping it in with all the other "fringe" topics that at the very least should be highly scrutinized.
I came to this conclusion the same way I did, flat-earth, birds-arent-real, chem-trails and many others.
By following the evidence you must realize they "broadcast" many things specifically as a form of misdirection. Look here not there. We are experiencing many research worthy topics that don't get the attention they deserve because too many people want some kind of "ufo disclosure" or "aha moment" where suddenly we are living out the plot of some classic sci-fi movie...
If the only evidence we have of the "trans-human" agenda is provided by the enemy, and you're asking the people pointing this out to prove a negative, I'd say it's you who are the shill fren. But remember "they want you divided".
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkhoThVj/x/c/4DyMGlUt7Fh - Don't get me wrong I've been in the same position, falling for the propaganda, dooming quite a bit too (in the past), just makes me laugh to see reasoning immediately attacked as shilling. ;-)
Now, do you want to do the "work" and discuss the topic or just waste everyones time?
And agreeing on a narrow and specific list of topics is not what this website is for, this website is for conducting research and exploring rabbit holes, namely those that either correlate or connect directly to Q related material.