You’re lying and misrepresenting what the article says. It says unvaccinated children can’t attend school in person, and when asked Bowser said they are not offering a remote learning alternative for vaccinated and unvaccinated children alike. Completely different than what your titled stated and what the articles title claimed. This is fake news.
The title implies that the school is doing remote learning but not allowing unvaccinated children to participate. This is not the case. As most people only read the title, as evidenced in the comments including the op, yes this is fake news and is misleading.
The actual story here is the DC mayor saying unvaccinated children can’t go to public school. We shouldn’t be fighting for remote learning like we’re some kind of lepers or something.
Most people don't and that's the issue. Even the OP couldn't figure it out, proving my point. Scroll up and read the third and fourth comments. Misleading is the word you were looking for, and that's exactly what I said.
You’re lying and misrepresenting what the article says. It says unvaccinated children can’t attend school in person, and when asked Bowser said they are not offering a remote learning alternative for vaccinated and unvaccinated children alike. Completely different than what your titled stated and what the articles title claimed. This is fake news.
The title says there is no remote learning option, isn't that what you just said?
The title implies that the school is doing remote learning but not allowing unvaccinated children to participate. This is not the case. As most people only read the title, as evidenced in the comments including the op, yes this is fake news and is misleading.
The actual story here is the DC mayor saying unvaccinated children can’t go to public school. We shouldn’t be fighting for remote learning like we’re some kind of lepers or something.
Or you could read it as it is, there is no remote option for unvaccinated, this is not a false statement. Possibly incomplete, but not false.
Most people don't and that's the issue. Even the OP couldn't figure it out, proving my point. Scroll up and read the third and fourth comments. Misleading is the word you were looking for, and that's exactly what I said.