Under Toxicity Conclusions near the end of the document.
"....In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated."
If sharing with normies, beware of the following.
"These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern."
So UK is still not acknowledging the harm the product was proven to cause during the trials. They're only stating the reality that existed prior to the clinical trials, before the harm was known.
Basically the UK advice is based on info that is more than two years stale...
What study showed the proven harm? Might be useful to help solidify the foundation of the argument
Pfizer's own documents show evidence of harm, as there were elevated miscarriage rates in the jab trial groups.
Naomi Wolf has been discussing it a fair bit.
Which documents though?
None, they don't exist, we're making it all up.