No bill before congress be longer than 1 page, and only concern 1 issue... When did it become ok to have a vote on thousands of pages covering many many issues in less time than it takes to read the table of contents? - The Great Awakening

301

No bill before congress be longer than 1 page, and only concern 1 issue... When did it become ok to have a vote on thousands of pages covering many many issues in less time than it takes to read the table of contents?

posted 2 years ago by rickynottricky 2 years ago by rickynottricky +301 / -0

32 comments

32 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (32)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– LiquidRitz 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

This is a bad idea.

Plenty of laws need to be intricate and address other facets of society.

Imagine writing a law that limits big pharma advertising. It has to address print, TV, internet, age, stipulations for existing spending, deadlines and more.

Then you have politicians have an easy scapegoat for not passing laws people want. "Sorry folks, one page couldn't fit it all."

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– MaxdOut 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

No problem.

Effective one year from now, Big Pharma will not advertise their products to the public.

Didn't they do the same with alcohol and cigarettes? Both are legal and neither particularly good for you.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– LiquidRitz 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Cool. Infomercials we be the new thing.

Not advertisements. Product placement in your favorite shows. Kids cartoons about the wonders of vaccinations.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q