Seems to me that the FBI could have gamed the inventory list by noting the original classifications without noting that any of those same documents may also have been declassified, especially since they took the time to inventory everyday items.
Common sense dictates the strong possibility that at least one document included would have gone through the system and been listed as declassified.
"ltem #17- Box/container from Storage Room
67 Magazines newspapers/press Articles and Other Printed Media dated between
7/2016- 3/2017
5 Articles of Clothing/Gift ltems
2 US Government Documents photographs without Classifiation Marking"
So they stole and looked at information their agents don't have clearance to touch or look at.
They were looking for a signed nude photo of that stipper sued.
Seems to me that the FBI could have gamed the inventory list by noting the original classifications without noting that any of those same documents may also have been declassified, especially since they took the time to inventory everyday items.
Common sense dictates the strong possibility that at least one document included would have gone through the system and been listed as declassified.
"ltem #17- Box/container from Storage Room 67 Magazines newspapers/press Articles and Other Printed Media dated between 7/2016- 3/2017 5 Articles of Clothing/Gift ltems 2 US Government Documents photographs without Classifiation Marking"
in case any pedes were wondering . . .