Is Smart City Doublespeak for Prison City?
(expose-news.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
I agree. Unless chemical or physical lobotomy becomes mandatory, it's bound to fail. Humans aren't ants or drones yet. I don't figure they'll succeed. Genetic variation will always throw wild cards regardless of suppressive measure. Variation and "wild" is nature's way, anomalies are built into the universe and will never be suppressed in my own opinion.
https://www.nanowerk.com/smartdust.php
...use your imagination and extrapolate what nefarious uses this could be put to ....
Interesting and insidious. They would need to be self replicating to be viable I figure or produced in such quantity that cost wouldn't perhaps be an issue if they weren't self replicating. Perhaps made from something abundant. They would need to be built in a way where molecular structure was from readily viable or easily sourced materials in high abundance. Oxidization would be a constant threat, requiring not only replication, but also rejuvenation, or perhaps a parasitic nature. Only atomic structure low on the periodic table meets this demand for stability, leading me to belive carbon is the go to. Blood and biological tissue are usually highly oxygenated. Biological structures could provide both necessities, but also require the living organism to not recognize the nanoparticle as a threat immunologically. Either precious metals or perhaps carbon would be necessary in the process to create and sustain such a creation, both of which process differently in an organic body, but conduct electrical frequency at sustainable and replicatible rates, but both conduct electrical impulses differently. Highly toxic metals store within organic bodies readily, stay long term, but are often fatal over time or are in such rare quantity upon the planet they would likely not be a viable source for mass production, leading me to believe it would need to be carbon, silicate or aluminum based to be viable. The body readily recycles cells and adds new carbon as well as other trace elements, but would likely ditch all unnecessary processes quickly. It would definitely need to be at a RNA or DNA level to sustain itself. Maybe this is why the push for MRNA technology? Far beyond what I have studied, but again you always have great rabbit holes to study anon. 😁
...I think you are on the right track in considering a carbon based semi viable creation based on a parasitic model....
...where we howl 1, we howl all...
Interesting topic Anon.
As of yet, I figure all that is needed is smart phones and cameras as a profitable, viable source for tracking our movements, thoughts, interests and daily pursuits. Cell phones and smart devices play right into human nature for our most basic needs and desires, leaving us vulnerable to be "hacked." If only we spent time to recognize we have the culmination of all the collective knowledge of humanity in our pockets and used it as such. That would be reoccurance Renaissance.
Graphene meets with the carbon theory, but is not yet easily produced or synthesized to my knowledge, without using other elements, products and processes that are not cost effective, or are so toxic to biologic structures to be sustainable. Atomically it is quite stable and was/is in abundance in the MRNA tech? Perhaps it was why it was included in the vax? I don't see how an organic structure could continue producing graphene at a sustainable rate though as it is highly toxic at levels needed to meet LE(low energy) Bluetooth or other WiFi requirements.