Interesting article, but the very first sentence in the Abstract is this sentence:
"The COVID-19 vaccine is a new vaccine aiming at control of COVID-19 pandemic."
Part of the problem is that these products were NEVER "vaccines" in the first place. We all know that the CDC and FDA changed the definition of what a "vaccine" is at the outset of the roll-out of the jabs so as to accommodate the Pharma corporations and so as to include these mRNA products in their new definition.
Once they changed the definition of what constitutes a vaccine, then any kind of chemical or biological atrocity can be used on the public. Want to inject people with sterilizing chemicals? Why not, it's a "vaccine" now. Want to see what happens if you inject people with raw sewage? Sure, why not? It's a "vaccine" too.
Yeah, what I just said. They can change definitions all they want, it doesn't make it true. Like defining a man as a woman, reality has to be acknowledged. I will NEVER consider the jabs to be a vaccine, and I have even informed my doctor to that reality.
Interesting article, but the very first sentence in the Abstract is this sentence:
"The COVID-19 vaccine is a new vaccine aiming at control of COVID-19 pandemic."
Part of the problem is that these products were NEVER "vaccines" in the first place. We all know that the CDC and FDA changed the definition of what a "vaccine" is at the outset of the roll-out of the jabs so as to accommodate the Pharma corporations and so as to include these mRNA products in their new definition.
Once they changed the definition of what constitutes a vaccine, then any kind of chemical or biological atrocity can be used on the public. Want to inject people with sterilizing chemicals? Why not, it's a "vaccine" now. Want to see what happens if you inject people with raw sewage? Sure, why not? It's a "vaccine" too.
It's a vaccine according to the new definition that was created to cover that the covid vaccine didn't fit the old definition for 'vaccine'.
Yeah, what I just said. They can change definitions all they want, it doesn't make it true. Like defining a man as a woman, reality has to be acknowledged. I will NEVER consider the jabs to be a vaccine, and I have even informed my doctor to that reality.
Sorry, should have read closer.
Of course it will be selective, because the broader definition could make IVM or HCQ 'vaccines'.
This.