If you think Trump supporters and Q researchers are sheeple or have herd mentality, then I don’t know what to tell you.
People engaging in similar behavior because they have a similar mentality and values is not always being a herd or being sheeple. This shouldn’t be hard to distinguish.
“Those are probably not the anons who have been researching Q for a while…”
You’re use of the word “probably” reveals that you’re making an assumption about people you don’t know. They could have been new to Q, they could know nothing about Q, they could have been following Q from the start.
You’re making a mountain out of a molehill over assumptions of your own making.
Also, before I forget, the use of “probably” and “I don’t know” do not mean that you’re not making assumptions. What you’re doing is using intentionally vague language to imply your points without actually saying anything concrete. Then you retreat behind the defense “I don’t know, probably”. It’s intellectually laziness. Make a concrete point and defend it.
If you think Trump supporters and Q researchers are sheeple or have herd mentality, then I don’t know what to tell you.
People engaging in similar behavior because they have a similar mentality and values is not always being a herd or being sheeple. This shouldn’t be hard to distinguish.
“Those are probably not the anons who have been researching Q for a while…”
You’re use of the word “probably” reveals that you’re making an assumption about people you don’t know. They could have been new to Q, they could know nothing about Q, they could have been following Q from the start.
You’re making a mountain out of a molehill over assumptions of your own making.
Also, before I forget, the use of “probably” and “I don’t know” do not mean that you’re not making assumptions. What you’re doing is using intentionally vague language to imply your points without actually saying anything concrete. Then you retreat behind the defense “I don’t know, probably”. It’s intellectually laziness. Make a concrete point and defend it.