You can read more about his life and legacy here. The history of what this man did for our country has been swept under the bus and he was killed for it. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_McKinley)
It's not about the fact it's on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is just a collection of sources thrown together in an information stew. What's really important are the sources at the bottom of the page, and which bits of information those sources are contributing to the wiki page.
You can read more about his life and legacy here. The history of what this man did for our country has been swept under the bus and he was killed for it. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_McKinley)
Wait so when it agrees with our line of thinking, then Wikipedia IS a reliable source of information? Seems like confirmation bias. It can't be both.
It's not about the fact it's on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is just a collection of sources thrown together in an information stew. What's really important are the sources at the bottom of the page, and which bits of information those sources are contributing to the wiki page.
Yeah, omission is also of note.