I went down this rabbit hole a while back. It doesn't make any sense, it's not like you "microdose" nuclear explosions. The main theory is that nuclear explosion vaporized the insides of the building and left a a radioactive hole (hence the "dust" cited in the link here) - like the actual nuke was subterranean. Thing is, this is easily debunked as all the windows would have blown out from the pressure wave of that.
The buildings were demo'd 100% but the nuke theory is frankly farcical.
Edit: c5 is making a convincing case for an entirely different type of thing than I've looked into before. See comments elsewhere thru thread.
It's not a nuke. It's a nuclear device. It would likely only be the size of a soda can. The installation would also include magnetic lensing, which would be much more complex (and take up the entire room). I was serious about saying to look up the "BB18 WTC" image. Note the installer wearing a static wrist strap. The BB18 is a capacitor/switch/relay kinda thing, from what I read. It's part of the electronic setup that surrounds the device.
Researching this I think they are things that would facilitate setting off regular charges simultaneously - I doubt they would be precise enough for anything nuclear.
Edit: That said, I did not know nukes could be as small as you state.
"An implosion fission weapon with an explosive yield of one kiloton can be constructed with as little as 1 to 2 kg (2.2 to 4.4 pounds) of plutonium or with about 5 to 10 kg (11 to 22 pounds) of highly enriched uranium."
1 kg of Pu would take up about 50cc. A moped engine cylinder.
Edit 2: However, 1 kt nuclear explosions would been noticed, not just cut beams. I don't know how small a device could be made and still have critical mass. All this having been said, I don't see how anyone would go thru all this when conventional explosives would do the job just fine.
Weapons tech is several generations ahead of this. The Israeli nukes are rumoured to have been manufactured in extremely advanced and precise processes utilizing atomic deposition, yielding perfectly spherical combustion of the nuclear fuel. The efficiency of the reaction is related to 1) the purity of the sample (atomic deposition allows for insane purity levels) and 2) how perfectly spherical the detonation is. This required perfectly spherical fuel and perfectly timed shaped charges around the fuel. The Israelis can 3D print the explosives shapes needed from 3D printers (allowing them to control the purity there, as well). (Source: Am nuclear weapons nerd)
The charges are referred to as "nuclear demolition charges" but that is an old Soviet term/distinction. In this case the purity of the yield was the key. It's exponential so the last four decimals and last few nanoseconds are what hype up the yield to insane levels for such a small device. Then the magnetic lensing reflects the X-rays produced towards the core's steel super structure, flash-melting a good portion of it all at once. It's literally as if someone at the press of a button could turn large sections of the core to the consistency of oatmeal. Hence, the free-fall speeds. And all the molten steel is camouflaged in the dust. Many of the conventional charges were only there to create the dust to hide the real reactions going on at the core.
Come on man, when the airplane took off from the ice wall fortress and was chemtrailing NYC that day - it ALSO dropped a tiny nuke while blasting the buildings with energy weapons. Also quantum - doesn't matter what, just 'quantum'...oh and AI...lots of AI.
I went down this rabbit hole a while back. It doesn't make any sense, it's not like you "microdose" nuclear explosions. The main theory is that nuclear explosion vaporized the insides of the building and left a a radioactive hole (hence the "dust" cited in the link here) - like the actual nuke was subterranean. Thing is, this is easily debunked as all the windows would have blown out from the pressure wave of that.
The buildings were demo'd 100% but the nuke theory is frankly farcical.
Edit: c5 is making a convincing case for an entirely different type of thing than I've looked into before. See comments elsewhere thru thread.
It's not a nuke. It's a nuclear device. It would likely only be the size of a soda can. The installation would also include magnetic lensing, which would be much more complex (and take up the entire room). I was serious about saying to look up the "BB18 WTC" image. Note the installer wearing a static wrist strap. The BB18 is a capacitor/switch/relay kinda thing, from what I read. It's part of the electronic setup that surrounds the device.
Researching this I think they are things that would facilitate setting off regular charges simultaneously - I doubt they would be precise enough for anything nuclear.
Edit: That said, I did not know nukes could be as small as you state.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-weapon/Gun-assembly-implosion-and-boosting
"An implosion fission weapon with an explosive yield of one kiloton can be constructed with as little as 1 to 2 kg (2.2 to 4.4 pounds) of plutonium or with about 5 to 10 kg (11 to 22 pounds) of highly enriched uranium."
1 kg of Pu would take up about 50cc. A moped engine cylinder.
Edit 2: However, 1 kt nuclear explosions would been noticed, not just cut beams. I don't know how small a device could be made and still have critical mass. All this having been said, I don't see how anyone would go thru all this when conventional explosives would do the job just fine.
Weapons tech is several generations ahead of this. The Israeli nukes are rumoured to have been manufactured in extremely advanced and precise processes utilizing atomic deposition, yielding perfectly spherical combustion of the nuclear fuel. The efficiency of the reaction is related to 1) the purity of the sample (atomic deposition allows for insane purity levels) and 2) how perfectly spherical the detonation is. This required perfectly spherical fuel and perfectly timed shaped charges around the fuel. The Israelis can 3D print the explosives shapes needed from 3D printers (allowing them to control the purity there, as well). (Source: Am nuclear weapons nerd)
OK fair enough...I'm obviously not (edit 2: I mean "capable of"/anywhere in this ballpark) competing here.
What kind of yield are we talking? Like just enough to cut beams or what?
Edit: Nvm, I see your other reply just (currently) below.
Interesting theory and actually makes sense. Thermite is slow but a small detonation at the steel structure would quickly bring the buildings down.
The charges are referred to as "nuclear demolition charges" but that is an old Soviet term/distinction. In this case the purity of the yield was the key. It's exponential so the last four decimals and last few nanoseconds are what hype up the yield to insane levels for such a small device. Then the magnetic lensing reflects the X-rays produced towards the core's steel super structure, flash-melting a good portion of it all at once. It's literally as if someone at the press of a button could turn large sections of the core to the consistency of oatmeal. Hence, the free-fall speeds. And all the molten steel is camouflaged in the dust. Many of the conventional charges were only there to create the dust to hide the real reactions going on at the core.
OK, very interesting.
Makes sense if indeed these things exist.
Some on gaw think nukes are a conspiracy so I'm at a dead end on this one.
Let's not say this out loud. Please, think of the kittens.
Come on man, when the airplane took off from the ice wall fortress and was chemtrailing NYC that day - it ALSO dropped a tiny nuke while blasting the buildings with energy weapons. Also quantum - doesn't matter what, just 'quantum'...oh and AI...lots of AI.
/s