Fucking ay, im laughing my ass off over here. The answer is so fucking simple, only an idiot can believe these were made by aliens. Yet somehow an idiot has millions of listeners tune into his podcast where he ignores these simple truths.
"WhErE DiD tHeY fInD sUcH lArGe StOnEs? ThErEs No LiMeStOnE tHaT bIg WhErE tHeY wErE bUiLt. PlUs tHeY wErE bUiLt ToO pErFeCtLy FoR tHeIr KnOwLeDgE oF mAtH aT tHe TiMe."
They didn't, they were small stones made out of cement mix and stacked together, then fused the same way they were mixed. The math is simple and based in logic, yet people think these empires were incapable of doing the math required to build these. We know the math on how to build space elevators, so where is it?
The fact the truth is THAT simple and it's been known for so long, really drives me crazy. Right now we have guys like Joe Rogan who thinks these civilizations were aided by aliens and were far more complex than what we know. The history and science is right there, Joe, shut up about aliens already!
It's not geopolymer. There ARE large stones used, especially in the middle pyramid, southeast corner. There's plenty of granite used in the interior structure, as well as the whole thing was originally encased in granite before that layer was torn down and re-used in the millenia since. Don't be ignorant, and more importantly, don't be a condescending asshole, leave that behavior for our enemies. Keep digging.
The aliens thing is a thought-trap and pisses me off too. Any time I broach the subject, everyone always immediately goes to the alien hypothesis. The idea that our civilization is a linear technological progression is too deeply engrained. An alternative is that civilization ebbs and flows (due to earth's catastrophe cycle) and that our ancient predecessors had high technology of a type we cannot currently fathom, though likely had to do with crystal or aural tech paths (maybe psychic? Maybe a combination) that allowed them to shape and move enormous stone thousands of kilometers. The megalithic structures of Peru and Egypt (and others) cannot be explained otherwise, unless you wanna throw aliens into the mix.
Trust them or not, but Forbes did a piece on how this stuff was moved and where it was quarried from. Based on it, it sounds like the original pyramids fell apart and slowly but surely they figured out what was necessary to make a long standing structure. It just so happened to require all kinds of stone from various places, and they depicted showing how these things were moved.
I've been to Meidum, the partially collapsed pyramid mentioned in the article. What they don't mention is that it and the mastabas are built on much, much, MUCH older megalithic structures underneath. I've also been to quarry in Aswan and it has this mind-bogglingly gigantic 1400 ton half-excavated granite obelisk with what seems like large scoop marks where it was being dug out. The official timeline and expalantions are full of these inconsistencies that don't hold up to scrutiny once you start looking.
If you're curious and don't mind longhand research videos, UnchartedX on YouTube does a phenomenal job of delving into these topics of ancient history/tech in Egypt and Peru. Nothing beats seeing these first-hand, though.
Recreated? By who? Who's trying to recreate the pyramids? No one is recreating them, but people have learned how it was done.
"We have discovered through archaeological digs, the tools used to build these structures, and how these tools were utilized to accomplish this task. The tools used by the Egyptians were very simple and consisted primarily of two devices. The first being a right angle rod marked along its length with increments denoting cubits. A hole was drilled on one end, where a plumb line would have attached, and the second tool was an unmarked rod with a hole at one end.
The idea behind this was first for one worker to look through the hole of the unmarked rod, and sight both the plumb line (which was held by a second worker) and a specified star. Then according to the foundation ceremonies, the worker would then face towards Ursa Major, and search for the polar star (which back then was Thuban located in the constellation of Draco). Once this star was located the worker then marked a line running from north to south coinciding with the notched increments of the other rod, pretty easy huh. This simple method was utilized to layout the foundations of every structure that adorns the landscape of Egypt."
And that's not even getting into the math portion of the article itself, just the device they used to layout the foundation.
Fucking ay, im laughing my ass off over here. The answer is so fucking simple, only an idiot can believe these were made by aliens. Yet somehow an idiot has millions of listeners tune into his podcast where he ignores these simple truths.
"WhErE DiD tHeY fInD sUcH lArGe StOnEs? ThErEs No LiMeStOnE tHaT bIg WhErE tHeY wErE bUiLt. PlUs tHeY wErE bUiLt ToO pErFeCtLy FoR tHeIr KnOwLeDgE oF mAtH aT tHe TiMe."
They didn't, they were small stones made out of cement mix and stacked together, then fused the same way they were mixed. The math is simple and based in logic, yet people think these empires were incapable of doing the math required to build these. We know the math on how to build space elevators, so where is it?
The fact the truth is THAT simple and it's been known for so long, really drives me crazy. Right now we have guys like Joe Rogan who thinks these civilizations were aided by aliens and were far more complex than what we know. The history and science is right there, Joe, shut up about aliens already!
It's not geopolymer. There ARE large stones used, especially in the middle pyramid, southeast corner. There's plenty of granite used in the interior structure, as well as the whole thing was originally encased in granite before that layer was torn down and re-used in the millenia since. Don't be ignorant, and more importantly, don't be a condescending asshole, leave that behavior for our enemies. Keep digging.
The aliens thing is a thought-trap and pisses me off too. Any time I broach the subject, everyone always immediately goes to the alien hypothesis. The idea that our civilization is a linear technological progression is too deeply engrained. An alternative is that civilization ebbs and flows (due to earth's catastrophe cycle) and that our ancient predecessors had high technology of a type we cannot currently fathom, though likely had to do with crystal or aural tech paths (maybe psychic? Maybe a combination) that allowed them to shape and move enormous stone thousands of kilometers. The megalithic structures of Peru and Egypt (and others) cannot be explained otherwise, unless you wanna throw aliens into the mix.
Fair enough on being condescending, I apologize.
Trust them or not, but Forbes did a piece on how this stuff was moved and where it was quarried from. Based on it, it sounds like the original pyramids fell apart and slowly but surely they figured out what was necessary to make a long standing structure. It just so happened to require all kinds of stone from various places, and they depicted showing how these things were moved.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidbressan/2017/09/28/papyrus-reveals-from-where-the-rocks-used-to-build-the-great-pyramid-came-from/
Cheers.
I've been to Meidum, the partially collapsed pyramid mentioned in the article. What they don't mention is that it and the mastabas are built on much, much, MUCH older megalithic structures underneath. I've also been to quarry in Aswan and it has this mind-bogglingly gigantic 1400 ton half-excavated granite obelisk with what seems like large scoop marks where it was being dug out. The official timeline and expalantions are full of these inconsistencies that don't hold up to scrutiny once you start looking.
If you're curious and don't mind longhand research videos, UnchartedX on YouTube does a phenomenal job of delving into these topics of ancient history/tech in Egypt and Peru. Nothing beats seeing these first-hand, though.
There are more than just mixing cement. Many Egypt artifacts are made of granite or harder stone.
Cool, we're talking about the pyramids right now though.
There are quite some large granite boxes in the pyramid which can’t be explained how they were placed in there.
Cool, there are plenty of interior stones in the payramids that are granite. Cool.
So simple you say yet they couldn't be re-created today
Recreated? By who? Who's trying to recreate the pyramids? No one is recreating them, but people have learned how it was done.
"We have discovered through archaeological digs, the tools used to build these structures, and how these tools were utilized to accomplish this task. The tools used by the Egyptians were very simple and consisted primarily of two devices. The first being a right angle rod marked along its length with increments denoting cubits. A hole was drilled on one end, where a plumb line would have attached, and the second tool was an unmarked rod with a hole at one end.
The idea behind this was first for one worker to look through the hole of the unmarked rod, and sight both the plumb line (which was held by a second worker) and a specified star. Then according to the foundation ceremonies, the worker would then face towards Ursa Major, and search for the polar star (which back then was Thuban located in the constellation of Draco). Once this star was located the worker then marked a line running from north to south coinciding with the notched increments of the other rod, pretty easy huh. This simple method was utilized to layout the foundations of every structure that adorns the landscape of Egypt."
And that's not even getting into the math portion of the article itself, just the device they used to layout the foundation.
http://www.actforlibraries.org/how-the-egyptians-used-mathmatics-to-build-the-pyramids/